1987
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8191(87)90060-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix algorithms on a hypercube I: Matrix multiplication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
74
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be done by the same approach for the general parallel matrix multiplication methods known as Fox algorithm [13] and SUMMA [21] but with extra tasks.…”
Section: Parallel Gtm Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be done by the same approach for the general parallel matrix multiplication methods known as Fox algorithm [13] and SUMMA [21] but with extra tasks.…”
Section: Parallel Gtm Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fox [10], and Cannon [4], algorithms have been proposed for parallelizing matrix multiplication to enhance its efficiency. These approaches balance inter-process communication, dependencies, and parallelism level to maximize efficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a matrix multiplication application that implements Fox's Algorithm (Fox and Hey, 1987) and Cannon's Algorithm (Johnsson, Harris et al 1989) assumes parallel processes to be in a rectangular grid.…”
Section: Iterative Mapreduce -Kmeans Clustering and Matrix Multiplicamentioning
confidence: 99%