2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-019-00829-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix effect evaluation and validation of the 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation scavenging assay, as well as its application using a tejate, an ancient beverage in Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The salivary thiol antioxidants, like glutathione and albumin, reduce the ABTS radical cation efficiently, whereas the same antioxidants do not reduce the Fe 3+-TPTZ efficiently to Fe 2+-TPTZ. 6,22 It is important to mention that one crucial advantage of a spectrophotometric measurement, like SAC, over the measure of an individual antioxidant compound using a liquid chromatographic or mass spectrometric technique is that it considers the additive, synergistic and antagonistic effects of antioxidant mixtures in actual samples. 22 ABTS scavenging finding agreed with a previous report that shows a reduced antioxidant balance (low glutathione peroxidase activity) in pregnant women, compared with nonpregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The salivary thiol antioxidants, like glutathione and albumin, reduce the ABTS radical cation efficiently, whereas the same antioxidants do not reduce the Fe 3+-TPTZ efficiently to Fe 2+-TPTZ. 6,22 It is important to mention that one crucial advantage of a spectrophotometric measurement, like SAC, over the measure of an individual antioxidant compound using a liquid chromatographic or mass spectrometric technique is that it considers the additive, synergistic and antagonistic effects of antioxidant mixtures in actual samples. 22 ABTS scavenging finding agreed with a previous report that shows a reduced antioxidant balance (low glutathione peroxidase activity) in pregnant women, compared with nonpregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,22 It is important to mention that one crucial advantage of a spectrophotometric measurement, like SAC, over the measure of an individual antioxidant compound using a liquid chromatographic or mass spectrometric technique is that it considers the additive, synergistic and antagonistic effects of antioxidant mixtures in actual samples. 22 ABTS scavenging finding agreed with a previous report that shows a reduced antioxidant balance (low glutathione peroxidase activity) in pregnant women, compared with nonpregnant women. 7 The proteins and PARS were not shown to have a role in the reduced ABTS-SAC in pregnant women (Figure 1 and Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antioxidant abilities of compounds can be tested with various assays in vitro that expose the compounds to different free synthetic radicals, such as the 2,2 -diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) or 2,2 -azino-bis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical. The scavenging activity of the antioxidant against the radical is monitored through the inherent spectral properties of the intact radical [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the validation and identification tests results were within the acceptability criteria stipulated by the FDA and International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines (ICH, 2005; US Department of Health and Human Services et al, 2018), except the stability results for the high QC samples stored at -18 ºC for 24 h. For this reason, the preparation of stock, standard solutions and experimental samples were on the same day they of the assays. For quantitative determinations, the application of the guidelines described by the FDA and ICH guarantees the reliability and strict control on the results, as well as the suitability, accuracy, and reproducibility of the assay (Gonzalez-Rivera et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%