2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31383-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix-valued Hermitian Positivstellensatz, Lurking Contractions, and Contractive Determinantal Representations of Stable Polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of a representation (1.1) with a contractive (resp., strictly contractive) matrix K provides a certificate for stability (resp., strong stability) of a polynomial p. Moreover, if merely a polynomial multiple of p has such a representation, the stability (resp., strong stability) of p is guaranteed. In a recent paper of the authors [11], the following result has been obtained. Let P ∈ C ℓ×m [z 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of a representation (1.1) with a contractive (resp., strictly contractive) matrix K provides a certificate for stability (resp., strong stability) of a polynomial p. Moreover, if merely a polynomial multiple of p has such a representation, the stability (resp., strong stability) of p is guaranteed. In a recent paper of the authors [11], the following result has been obtained. Let P ∈ C ℓ×m [z 1 , .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Thus we can find a constant c > 0 so that cg ρ A,Z < 1. By [11,Theorem 3.4] applied to F = cg ρ , we obtain a n = (n 1 , . .…”
Section: Contractive Determinantal Depresentations Of Stable Polynomimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 5.1 is somewhat unsatisfying since the kernel decomposition (5.3) holds only for Z, W ∈ Ω even if we assume that the kernel S is given on all of Ξ, unlike the case for Positivstellensätze as appearing in classical commutative algebraic geometry (see e.g. [13,21] as well as [15] for the matrix-valued case). To get a version of Theorem The result of Theorem 5.1 is that Problem C ′ has an affirmative solution under some additional hypotheses, but in a weaker form.…”
Section: Problem C: Kernel-dominance Certificatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , z d ) ∈ C d satisfying P(z) < 1 (see [2,4,11]); in this case, P = Z viewed as a polynomial in matrix entries z (r) ij , i, j = 1, . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%