Matter density distributions of 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Ne</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>
 and 
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>
 e

Li, Z. H.; Kuang, Y.; Huang, Yin; Tu, X. L.; Li, Zhi-Pan; Fang, Kan; Zhang, J. T.; Yue, K.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.064310

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To reduce the error bars caused by the uncertainty of absolute normalization, the matter radius of 78 Kr was deduced through relative differential cross sections. A similar method has been used to determine matter radii of 20,22 Ne, 24,26 Mg [34], and 16 O [35] in the previous work. To further check the possible uncertainties caused by the relative analysis, we inspected data from Ref.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Matter radius of Kr78 from proton elastic scattering at 153 MeV

Zhang¹,

Ma²,

Huang³

et al. 2023

Phys. Rev. C

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Small-angle differential cross sections of proton elastic scattering off 78 Kr with a collision energy of 152.7 MeV/u were measured at the experimental Cooler Storage Ring of the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou (HIRFL-CSR). Low energy recoil protons from the elastic scattering were counted by a silicon-strip detector to determine relative differential cross sections. A model-dependent root-mean-square matter radius of 4.16(12) fm for the 78 Kr nucleus was deduced by employing the Glauber model. Compared to the proton radius of 4.13 fm for 78 Kr, our center value of matter radius is slightly larger. This finding in 78 Kr is opposite to the known results of 76,80 Kr, where the matter radii are smaller than the corresponding proton radii. However, considering the relatively large radius error of 78 Kr, the difference is not statistically significant, and further experiments are necessary.

show abstract