1992
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(52)90041-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matter in a magnetic field in the Thomas-Fermi and related theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an equally important 1974 paper, Banerjee, Constantinescu, and Rehak 11 ͑hereafter BCR͒ also calculated this exchange energy and obtained a result that looks very similar to that of DG. The calculations of DG and BCR provided the background for a large body of later work on the exchange and correlation energies of the electron gas in high magnetic fields 1,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and are also frequently quoted as input for the local-density approximation to current-densityfunctional theory in strong magnetic fields. [18][19][20][21][22] A major limitation of these early calculations is their restriction to complete spin polarization and the lowest Landau level, which in three dimensions requires either magnetic fields that are beyond what is currently achievable in the laboratory or restriction to low-density low-effective-mass systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an equally important 1974 paper, Banerjee, Constantinescu, and Rehak 11 ͑hereafter BCR͒ also calculated this exchange energy and obtained a result that looks very similar to that of DG. The calculations of DG and BCR provided the background for a large body of later work on the exchange and correlation energies of the electron gas in high magnetic fields 1,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and are also frequently quoted as input for the local-density approximation to current-densityfunctional theory in strong magnetic fields. [18][19][20][21][22] A major limitation of these early calculations is their restriction to complete spin polarization and the lowest Landau level, which in three dimensions requires either magnetic fields that are beyond what is currently achievable in the laboratory or restriction to low-density low-effective-mass systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the error in the Hartree-Fock approach is expected to be less than the 1% accuracy characteristic of zero-field Hartree-Fock calculations [28,33]. Other calculations of heavy atoms in strong magnetic fields include Thomas-Fermi type statistical models [34,35,36] and density functional theory [37,38,39,40]. The Thomas-Fermi type models are useful in establishing asymptotic scaling relations, but are not adequate for obtaining accurate binding and excitation energies.…”
Section: A Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projector IIo on the lowest Landau band with v = 0 is given by the kernel (see, e.g., [25], Appendix) where xl = (xl,x2) is the component of x E R3 perpendicular to the field and P' is the projector in the vectors in C2 with spin component s = -: .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%