2021
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2021.3077504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Max-Min Fair Precoder Design and Power Allocation for MU-MIMO NOMA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the objective function and the constraint C1 in P 2 are convex, and the challenge is only in the constraints C2 and C3. However, we would like to mention that, similar problem has been considered and solved in the literature using bisection-based method, we refer the reader to [40]- [43] for more details.…”
Section: B Review: Conventional Noma Precodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the objective function and the constraint C1 in P 2 are convex, and the challenge is only in the constraints C2 and C3. However, we would like to mention that, similar problem has been considered and solved in the literature using bisection-based method, we refer the reader to [40]- [43] for more details.…”
Section: B Review: Conventional Noma Precodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two distinct approaches that form the basis of SotA benchmark solutions are the sum-rate maximization approach of [45]- [49], and the max-min worst-case strategy pursued in [50]- [52], both of which are briefly reviewed below for the convenience of the reader.…”
Section: A State-of-the-art Benchmark Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, [24]- [27] aims to maximize the sum-rate capacity in the MU-mMIMO systems, where FDP and HP are studied in [24] and [25]- [27], respectively. Nonetheless, the sum-rate maximization objective might result in poor performance for arXiv:2207.08588v1 [cs.IT] 18 Jul 2022 [19], [20] [21] [22] [23]…”
Section: A Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%