2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.09.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxillary Stability Following Le Fort I Osteotomy in Combination With Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Comparative Study Between Titanium Miniplate and Poly-l-Lactic Acid Plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the use of resorbable materials to stabilize the maxillofacial skeleton has been reported (Ueki et al, 2005, Ueki et al, 2006. In this study, there was no significant difference between the titanium plate, PLLA plate and uHA/PLLA plate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Recently, the use of resorbable materials to stabilize the maxillofacial skeleton has been reported (Ueki et al, 2005, Ueki et al, 2006. In this study, there was no significant difference between the titanium plate, PLLA plate and uHA/PLLA plate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…In addition to the lower incidence of nerve injuries, IVRO offers other advantages over SSRO, such as a reduced operating time and less bleeding, by virtue of its technical simplicity (Bell andYamaguchi, 1991, Westemark et al, 1998). Furthermore, IVRO is a more favorable osteotomy procedure for asymmetry cases, because the bony interference is reduced compared to that associated with SSRO (Ueki et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a significant difference in the A point in the lateral cephalometric measurements was found between the two groups. 1 This suggested that the difference between titanium and the absorbable plate could affect the stability following Le Fort I osteotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The biodegradable devices have major advantages over conventional metallic implants. There is no need for a second operation to remove the implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation