1994
DOI: 10.1006/jabr.1994.1164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal Abelian Normal Subgroups of Galois Pro-2-Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rigid elements have since been extensively used to detect valuations in large Galois groups. For instance, using rigid elements one can recover inertia/decomposition using the full relative pro-ℓ Galois theory of a field whose characteristic is prime to ℓ and which contains µ ℓ [EN94], [Efr95], [EK98]. Similar results also show how to recover inertia/decomposition in the absolute Galois group of an arbitrary field [Koe03].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rigid elements have since been extensively used to detect valuations in large Galois groups. For instance, using rigid elements one can recover inertia/decomposition using the full relative pro-ℓ Galois theory of a field whose characteristic is prime to ℓ and which contains µ ℓ [EN94], [Efr95], [EK98]. Similar results also show how to recover inertia/decomposition in the absolute Galois group of an arbitrary field [Koe03].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In a few words, the theory of rigid elements in the context of pro-ℓ Galois groups ( [EN94], [Efr95], [EK98]) asserts that the only way the situation above can arise is from valuation theory. More precisely, let K be a field such that char K = ℓ and µ ℓ ⊂ K. Suppose that σ, τ ∈ G K are non-torsion elements such that σ, τ = σ ⋊ τ is non-pro-cyclic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Galois theory one has the following result, due to A. Engler, J. Koenigsmann and J. Nogueira (cf. [10] and [11]). Theorem 3.2 Let K be a field containing a root of 1 of order p (and also √ −1 if p = 2), and suppose that the maximal pro-p Galois group G K (p) of K is not isomorphic to Z p .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 1.6. For other characterizations of decomposition groups -applicable to much more general situations -see, for example, Theorem 1.16 of [Pop 1994], Theorem 2 of [Koenigsmann 2003], or the results in [Engler and Koenigsmann 1998;Engler and Nogueira 1994].…”
Section: Generalities On Galois Groups Of Function Fields Of Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%