2021
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/20175356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal Newton Points and the Quantum Bruhat Graph

Abstract: We discuss a surprising relationship between the partially ordered set of Newton points associated to an affine Schubert cell and the quantum cohomology of the complex flag variety. The main theorem provides a combinatorial formula for the unique maximum element in this poset in terms of paths in the quantum Bruhat graph, whose vertices are indexed by elements in the finite Weyl group. Key to establishing this connection is the fact that paths in the quantum Bruhat graph encode saturated chains in the strong B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An explicit description of ν([b w ]) is given by Milićević in [21,Theorem 3.2] for elements w ∈ W that are suitably far from walls of any Weyl chamber. To quantify the later condition, let us define for any dominant coweight λ its depth as depth(λ) = min{ α, λ : α is a simple root}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An explicit description of ν([b w ]) is given by Milićević in [21,Theorem 3.2] for elements w ∈ W that are suitably far from walls of any Weyl chamber. To quantify the later condition, let us define for any dominant coweight λ its depth as depth(λ) = min{ α, λ : α is a simple root}.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.2.1. An uniform bound is given in [21,Corollary 3.3] in the quasi-simple case, which says that the description of ν([b w ]) provided in the article is valid whenever the following depth hypothesis is satisfied on λ:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following example is a particularly where s i denote the simple reflections in S. In this example, the constant M for the regularity assumption on μ equals 74 and is thus satisfied. Then the pair (x, s) satisfies the requirements of Proposition 4.2 and the superregularity hypothesis of [13] and [14].…”
Section: An Explicit Examplementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In order to find a pair (x, s) as in Proposition 4.2, we use the mathematics software system. SageMath Here, to compute generic Newton points and to check cordiality we use the results of [13,Thm. 3.2] and [14,Prop.…”
Section: An Explicit Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation