Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Interference testing is a common tool for addressing reservoir connectivity and compartmentalization risks. Due to the high costs of deep-water and ultra-deep-water extended well testing, this type of test is rarely performed during the appraisal phase and is usually postponed until the start of the field development. With the infrastructure in place, testing can be carried out with minimum planning and at a minimum cost. This is generally acceptable for fields with a lower subsurface complexity. However, for complex turbidite fields, this information becomes critical at the appraisal and early development planning stages to reduce the risks in depletion optimization and production infrastructure planning. To make testing practical, it has to be performed in a way that minimizes rig time and de-risks collection of required data. To optimize the interference test design for the West Africa deep-water field appraisal phase, a simulation study was carried out to assess the impact of major uncertainties. A fine-scale 3D simulation model was used due to high heterogeneity and complex connectivity between individual channels and channel complexes. Impact of the drawdown rate, flow duration, tidal effect amplitude, OWC, faults transmissibility, absolute permeability, reservoir pore volume, and zones connectivity on interference time for different selections of test and observation wells were assessed through the sensitivity runs. Results were analyzed to get a better understanding of reservoir dynamic response such as pressure travel time and potential interference between zones. Based on this study a flexible interference test plan was defined that ensures optimal rig use and minimal risk of sub-optimal dataset collection. This plan embeds both pre-test decisions and real-time decisions that depend on early time observations. An optimal test and observation wells setup that provides a balance between the rig time and value of information will depend on the planned appraisal well results and is one of the decisions to be finalized before the test. However, decisions on flow duration adjustment and consequent data monitoring in the observation wells will be made based on a set of early time events identified from the sensitivity of pressure interference response between different zones and wells. The proposed uncertainty driven approach provides an obvious advantage over the common test design based on the "best technical estimate" model. It also provides a better basis for test feasibility decision and cost-effective implementation.
Interference testing is a common tool for addressing reservoir connectivity and compartmentalization risks. Due to the high costs of deep-water and ultra-deep-water extended well testing, this type of test is rarely performed during the appraisal phase and is usually postponed until the start of the field development. With the infrastructure in place, testing can be carried out with minimum planning and at a minimum cost. This is generally acceptable for fields with a lower subsurface complexity. However, for complex turbidite fields, this information becomes critical at the appraisal and early development planning stages to reduce the risks in depletion optimization and production infrastructure planning. To make testing practical, it has to be performed in a way that minimizes rig time and de-risks collection of required data. To optimize the interference test design for the West Africa deep-water field appraisal phase, a simulation study was carried out to assess the impact of major uncertainties. A fine-scale 3D simulation model was used due to high heterogeneity and complex connectivity between individual channels and channel complexes. Impact of the drawdown rate, flow duration, tidal effect amplitude, OWC, faults transmissibility, absolute permeability, reservoir pore volume, and zones connectivity on interference time for different selections of test and observation wells were assessed through the sensitivity runs. Results were analyzed to get a better understanding of reservoir dynamic response such as pressure travel time and potential interference between zones. Based on this study a flexible interference test plan was defined that ensures optimal rig use and minimal risk of sub-optimal dataset collection. This plan embeds both pre-test decisions and real-time decisions that depend on early time observations. An optimal test and observation wells setup that provides a balance between the rig time and value of information will depend on the planned appraisal well results and is one of the decisions to be finalized before the test. However, decisions on flow duration adjustment and consequent data monitoring in the observation wells will be made based on a set of early time events identified from the sensitivity of pressure interference response between different zones and wells. The proposed uncertainty driven approach provides an obvious advantage over the common test design based on the "best technical estimate" model. It also provides a better basis for test feasibility decision and cost-effective implementation.
The determination of well and reservoir parameters is paramount during exploration, appraisal of new reservoirs, and equally important during the development and production phases of a field. The interpretation of pressure transient-test data is one of the tools to obtain such parameters under dynamic conditions. Often this data is substantially influenced by non-reservoir factors such as gauge drift, adjacent noise due to natural or operational reasons, insufficient gauge resolution and dominant tidal effects. Any of these non-reservoir factors can significantly lead to a misleading interpretation of the formation. Rigorous vigilance against such occurrences is particularly important in designing deep transient well tests. The paper quantifies these effects. Obtaining strong, unequivocal reservoir responses in the pressure data are imperative in extracting the reservoir and well characteristics. Individual and convoluted effects of noise, drift, resolution, periodic tides have been looked into quantitatively to demonstrate the situations when the reservoir signal is too weak to make any meaningful characterization. Reservoir models have been utilized to develop quantitative criteria to describe the dominance and subsidence of the effects of noise, resolution, drift and periodic tides under different operating conditions. These criteria should guide test design so that the subsequent test can produce meaningful data. Depending on the amount of disruption caused in the measurements, there are situations when the test objective may not be achieved at all. Failure to create dominant reservoir responses results from insufficient signal-to-noise ratio due to the rate of production and the pressure drawdown. It is a function of formation, fluid properties or mechanical environment. A minimum rate of production for creating the required magnitude of signal-to-noise ratio must be achieved to interpret correctly the reservoir response. The paper provides guidelines to determine the minimum rate and drawdown needed to obtain the presence of deep heterogeneities or boundaries with a reasonable level of certainty. If a test is run with a rate lower than the minimum value, for example, the data will be biased by other hardware or natural factors, unrelated to the reservoir response. Examples are also presented with artifacts of non-reservoir effects to show how misleading characteristics of the reservoir and the well can be deduced with such distorted data. This study establishes cause-effect relationships due to certain non-reservoir factors so that engineers can select their hardware, choose the methods and timings to mitigate the associated undesirable effects. Such a practical guide to select the most suitable transient test will rightfully fill in its place in the literature. The methodology applies equally to wireline testing operations, deep transient testing, drill-stem testing and production testing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.