2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-20350-3_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximization of k-Submodular Function with a Matroid Constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For monotone k-submodular maximization under a total size constraint (i.e., at most a given number of items can be selected), Ohsaka and Yoshida [9] proposed a 1 2 -approximation algorithm, and for the problem under individual size constraints (i.e., in each dimension at most a given number of items can be selected), they gave a 1 3 -approximation algorithm. Under a matroid constraint, Sakaue [13] shown that fully greedy algorithm is 1 2 -approximation for the monotone case, and Sun et al [15] gave a 1 3 -approximation algorithm for the non-monotone case.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For monotone k-submodular maximization under a total size constraint (i.e., at most a given number of items can be selected), Ohsaka and Yoshida [9] proposed a 1 2 -approximation algorithm, and for the problem under individual size constraints (i.e., in each dimension at most a given number of items can be selected), they gave a 1 3 -approximation algorithm. Under a matroid constraint, Sakaue [13] shown that fully greedy algorithm is 1 2 -approximation for the monotone case, and Sun et al [15] gave a 1 3 -approximation algorithm for the non-monotone case.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of maximizing a k-submodular function is known to be NP-hard, since it is a generalization of the NP-hard submodular maximization problem. Extensive research has been dedicated to developing efficient algorithms with desirable approximation ratios for the problem under different constraints, for example, cardinality constraints [2,9,18], matroid constraints [13,15], knapsack constraints [17,12], and the unconstrained setting [19,6,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding monotone k-SMM under matroid constraints, Sakaue [20] obtained an approximation result of 1/2 through the greedy algorithm. And in the non-monotone case, Sun et al [22] proposed an algorithm that ensures a 1/3-approximation. Niu et al [18] obtained approximation ratios of (1/2 − ϵ) and (1/3 − ϵ) using a threshold-decreasing algorithm for monotone and non-monotone k-SMM, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%