2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.orl.2015.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing expected utility over a knapsack constraint

Abstract: The expected utility knapsack problem is to pick a set of items with random values so as to maximize the expected utility of the total value of the items picked subject to a knapsack constraint. We devise an approximation algorithm for this problem by combining sample average approximation and greedy submodular maximization. Our main result is an algorithm that maximizes an increasing submodular function over a knapsack constraint with an approximation ratio better than the well known (1-1/e) factor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li and Deshpande [20] obtain a PTAS for the expected utility maximization (EUM) problem for several classes of utility functions (including for example increasing concave functions which typically indicate risk-averseness), and a large class of feasibility constraints (including cardinality constraint, s-t simple paths, matchings, and knapsacks). Similar results for other utility functions and feasibility constraints can be found in [27,21,4]. In the online problem, we can apply our algorithms, using their PTASs as the offline oracle.…”
Section: Applicationssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Li and Deshpande [20] obtain a PTAS for the expected utility maximization (EUM) problem for several classes of utility functions (including for example increasing concave functions which typically indicate risk-averseness), and a large class of feasibility constraints (including cardinality constraint, s-t simple paths, matchings, and knapsacks). Similar results for other utility functions and feasibility constraints can be found in [27,21,4]. In the online problem, we can apply our algorithms, using their PTASs as the offline oracle.…”
Section: Applicationssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We remark that the above independence assumption is also made for past studies on the offline EUM and K-MAX problems [27,20,21,4,13], so it is not an extra assumption for the online learning case. Assumption 2 (Bounded reward value).…”
Section: Setup and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Together with his coauthors, Shabbir Ahmed made substantial contributions in advancing the state-of-the-art of mathematical programming methods for solving this challenging set of problems (Ahmed and Atamtürk [2], Yu and Ahmed [38,39]). In this article, we study optimization problems in which the expected value of the function f composed with a set union operator is maximized over a discrete feasible region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%