2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2016.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximizing the robustness for simple assembly lines with fixed cycle time and limited number of workstations

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1 ( Rossi et al (2016) ) . The stability radius ρ for a given feasible solution is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1 ( Rossi et al (2016) ) . The stability radius ρ for a given feasible solution is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a consequence, the notations ρ 1 and ρ ∞ will be used for 1 and ∞ , respectively. The integer programming formulation of RBP 1 , RBP ∞ and RBP rr is based on the following three theorems, which are demonstrated by Rossi et al (2016) , by Sotskov et al (2006) and by Pirogov (2019) , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The design objective is often to minimize the total line cost (Battaïa et al, 2012ab), however, other performance criteria can be also considered, for example the robustness of the obtained solution (Gurevsky et al, 2012;Gurevsky et al, 2013a;Gurevsky et al, 2013b;Rossi et al, 2016;Sotskov et al, 2019). In contrast, the reconfiguration problem is characterized by a different objective which is to minimize the cost incurred by the modifications of the line.…”
Section: Design and Optimization Of Transfer Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%