1960
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1960.1144808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum angular accuracy of tracking a radio star by lobe comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitude variation may be due to range variations, positioning of the transmitter antenna, fading in the medium, and also due to variations of the transmitter power about some nominal value. Thus, the signal received is of the form vch s(t) exp (jfpch) (5) where vch represents the channel gain effects and 'Pch iS channel phase characteristics. Now, vch is assumed to be a Rayleigh random variable with variance 2Gb2, so that the received signal can be written as bs(t) where b = b, -jb5 and bc and b5 are independent zero-mean Gaussian random variables of variance ab2.…”
Section: The Model and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amplitude variation may be due to range variations, positioning of the transmitter antenna, fading in the medium, and also due to variations of the transmitter power about some nominal value. Thus, the signal received is of the form vch s(t) exp (jfpch) (5) where vch represents the channel gain effects and 'Pch iS channel phase characteristics. Now, vch is assumed to be a Rayleigh random variable with variance 2Gb2, so that the received signal can be written as bs(t) where b = b, -jb5 and bc and b5 are independent zero-mean Gaussian random variables of variance ab2.…”
Section: The Model and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is felt that this model represents a suitable embodiment of the actual phenomenon, since the amplitude is generally unknown due to antenna orientation, range uncertainties, etc. The model used by Manasse [5], that of the signal process being a random process, does not hold, since the signal is assumed time-invariant over the processing interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%