2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-010-9208-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross Model Using Particle Filters

Abstract: Term structure of interest rates, Sequential Monte Carlo method, Importance sampling,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approaches that derive the probability distributions from the actual model dynamics (as described by SDEs) and then use these distributions to fit parameters. Examples include Kalman filter ( [1]) for the Vasicek model, while for general affine models particle filtering (PF) might be a more natural algorithm (see [10]).…”
Section: Model Calibration/fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches that derive the probability distributions from the actual model dynamics (as described by SDEs) and then use these distributions to fit parameters. Examples include Kalman filter ( [1]) for the Vasicek model, while for general affine models particle filtering (PF) might be a more natural algorithm (see [10]).…”
Section: Model Calibration/fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CIR (Cox, Ingersoll, & Ross, 1985) model has proved to be very popular for achieving that in both the academic literature and among practitioners due to the three features commonly observed in the data; namely: the nonnegativity of interest rates; conditional heteroskedasticity; and the time-varying market prices of risk (De Rossi, 2010). The CIR (Cox, Ingersoll, & Ross, 1985) model has proved to be very popular for achieving that in both the academic literature and among practitioners due to the three features commonly observed in the data; namely: the nonnegativity of interest rates; conditional heteroskedasticity; and the time-varying market prices of risk (De Rossi, 2010).…”
Section: Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an application, we demonstrate that the proposed modification can efficiently capture the extreme quantiles of an instantaneously compounded interest rate-that is, the short rate (and hence the extreme quantiles of the corresponding bond yields), when the short rate is driven by the CIR process (Cox, Ingersoll, & Ross, 1985). In fact, there is extensive literature on the use of filtering frameworks in interest rate modeling (e.g., Chatterjee, 2005;Date & Wang, 2009;De Rossi, 2010;Fileccia, 2012;Geyer & Pichler, 1999). In fact, there is extensive literature on the use of filtering frameworks in interest rate modeling (e.g., Chatterjee, 2005;Date & Wang, 2009;De Rossi, 2010;Fileccia, 2012;Geyer & Pichler, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, these routines do not rely on the presence of first-order or even second-order derivatives of the likelihood function. This feature is convenient if the likelihood function is evaluated by a particle filter, where the resampling step generates discontinuities in the likelihood function (Fernández-Villaverde and Rubio-Ramírez 2007;Rossi 2004). Thus, a gradient based optimization routine is likely to perform poorly in this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%