PsycTESTS Dataset 2012
DOI: 10.1037/t05047-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

29
1,494
1
121

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,043 publications
(1,913 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
29
1,494
1
121
Order By: Relevance
“…Reliability in the current study was α = .84 and .89 for males at Times 1 and 2 (T1 and T2) respectively, and α = .82 at T1 and .89 at T2 for females. The MSCEIT-YV provides scores of emotional functioning in four domains (perceiving, using, understanding, and managing emotions) but it also provides two Area scores (Experiential EI [perceiving + using] and Strategic EI [understanding + managing]), and a Total EI score (based on all four domains) (Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2002;Mayer et al, 2005;Rivers et al, 2008;Stough, Saklofske, & Parker, 2009). The actual scores can be interpreted as intelligence scores (Mean = 100, SD = 15) (Mayer et al, 2002;Rivers et al, 2008;Stough et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliability in the current study was α = .84 and .89 for males at Times 1 and 2 (T1 and T2) respectively, and α = .82 at T1 and .89 at T2 for females. The MSCEIT-YV provides scores of emotional functioning in four domains (perceiving, using, understanding, and managing emotions) but it also provides two Area scores (Experiential EI [perceiving + using] and Strategic EI [understanding + managing]), and a Total EI score (based on all four domains) (Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2002;Mayer et al, 2005;Rivers et al, 2008;Stough, Saklofske, & Parker, 2009). The actual scores can be interpreted as intelligence scores (Mean = 100, SD = 15) (Mayer et al, 2002;Rivers et al, 2008;Stough et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los críticos de esta perspectiva (Roberts, MacCann, Matthews y Zeidner, 2010;Van Rooy, Whitman y Viswesvaran, 2010), argumentan que las escalas desarrolladas para medir la IE se solapan con algunas medidas de personalidad, lo que contribuye a disminuir su validez discriminante. El modelo de habilidad cognitiva (Mayer y Salovey, 1993;Mayer, Salovey y Caruso, 2002), considera a la IE como un conjunto de habilidades para percibir, valorar y expresar emociones adaptativamente; entender las emociones y cogniciones emocionales, y regular los afectos para promover el crecimiento intelectual (Fiori y Antonakis, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Los más difundidos son la Escala Multifactorial de Inteligencia Emocional (Mayer, Caruso y Salovey, 1999) y el Inventario Mayer-Salovey-Caruso (MSCEIT; Mayer, Salovey y Caruso, 2002), que constituye una versión superadora del primero. El MSCEIT mide cuatro dimensiones de la IE (percepción, uso, entendimiento y regulación emocional) a través de 141 ítems, posee adecuada validez discriminante y convergente (Mayer, Salovey y Caruso, 2012) y, en la actualidad, es el más utilizado para medir la IE habilidad.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…As practitioners seem eager to assess the EI of potential new employees in order to make selection decisions (Zeidner, Roberts, & Matthews, 2004), various test vendors have started to sell EI measures (Joseph & Newman, 2010). Although some of these measures are ability tests (Mayer, Salovey, & Caruso, 2002), most popular measures in practice are self-report trait-based EI measures wherein respondents report their ''abilities, competencies, and skills related to understanding oneself and others, relating to peers and family members, and adapting to changing environmental situations and demands '' (Bar-On, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%