MBSE Infusion and Modernization Initiative (MIAMI): “Hot” Benefits for Real NASA Applications

Holladay, Jon; Knizhnik, Jessica; Weiland, Karen J.; Stein, Amanda; Sanders, Terry; Schwindt, Paul

doi:10.1109/aero.2019.8741795

Cited by 16 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…During the MBSE Pathfinder Part 2, seven teams were set up to cover additional or different mission areas of interest (Holladay, et al, 2019). In the same way as the previous year, all the teams prepared final reports that provided detail about the lessons learned from their work.…”

Section: Mbse Pathfinder Part 2 In 2017mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At the start of MBSE Pathfinder Part 1, many modelers created models with as much information as they could fit into the model because the tools provide that capability. When the MBSE Pathfinder Part 2 added its Advisory Board, the Advisory Board recommended that models should exist to answer an engineering question (Holladay, et al, 2019). Good systems engineering practice still needs to be performed in a modeling environment.…”

Section: Models Should Have a Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

“…These combined with hands-on on-the-job training as well as hands-on class room training have been most effective. MIAMI participants find value in turning to the NASA agency level CoP for questions and for best practices (Holladay, et al, 2019). The NASA MBSE community looks to the agency MBSE CoP for training and continuing education.…”

Section: Training Is Continually Neededmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When NASA began its MBSE Pathfinder activity in 2016, it had a key objective to "capture issues and opportunities (lessons learned)" (Weiland & Holladay, 2017). As the MBSE Pathfinder evolved into the MBSE Infusion and Modernization Initiative (MIAMI), which now includes a Community of Practice (CoP), a Strategy Group, and an Advisory Board along with the MBSE Pathfinder, MIAMI continued the MBSE Pathfinder's legacy for collecting, analyzing, and responding to its lessons learned (Holladay, et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Proceedings of the 11th Model-Based Enterprise Summit (MBE 2020)

Robles-Ramirez

Tryfonas²,

Escamilla-Ambrosio

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of NIST. Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document to illustrate a point or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the NIST, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

show abstract

Section: Mbse Pathfinder Part 2 In 2017mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Models Should Have a Purposementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Training Is Continually Neededmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Proceedings of the 11th Model-Based Enterprise Summit (MBE 2020)

Robles-Ramirez

Tryfonas²,

Escamilla-Ambrosio

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…NASA's Pathfinder endeavor provided a natural partnership for the NASA assurance community to develop MBMA concepts [6,7]. Multiple Pathfinder projects allowed for testing ideas, development of views and viewpoints, and engaging the model for safety and reliability products and analyses.…”

Section: Cross Life Cycle Modeling Teammentioning

confidence: 99%

Enabling Assurance in the MBSE Environment

Evans¹,

Cornford

Kotsifakis

et al. 2020

2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design thinking, lean startup, and high‐technology marketing for human‐centered systems engineering

Weiland

Knizhnik

2022

Systems Engineering

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of design thinking, lean startup, and high‐technology marketing in systems engineering is presented as a case study. All were used and evaluated for their potential to improve systems engineering processes and design, address the challenges of culture change, increase the adoption rate of new technology, and engage with potential users and sponsors more effectively. Multiple examples of training and use on a Model‐Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) initiative at a large government agency showcase how these approaches were tailored and used successfully for significant benefits such as enhanced collaboration and better problem definition and design solutions. Challenges remain for use by quiet thinkers and with virtual teams. These new ways of thinking are well aligned with creating and using new technologies and are suitable for situations involving innovation, uncertainty, and change within organizations. This case study intends to familiarize systems engineers with the application of these human‐centered approaches, to interest systems engineers in incorporating these approaches into their work processes, and to inspire the systems engineering research community to investigate further.

show abstract

MBSE Infusion and Modernization Initiative (MIAMI): “Hot” Benefits for Real NASA Applications

Cited by 16 publications

References 5 publications

Proceedings of the 11th Model-Based Enterprise Summit (MBE 2020)

Proceedings of the 11th Model-Based Enterprise Summit (MBE 2020)

Enabling Assurance in the MBSE Environment

Design thinking, lean startup, and high‐technology marketing for human‐centered systems engineering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About