2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10090591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCCRNet: A Multi-Level Change Contextual Refinement Network for Remote Sensing Image Change Detection

Abstract: Change detection based on bi-temporal remote sensing images has made significant progress in recent years, aiming to identify the changed and unchanged pixels between a registered pair of images. However, most learning-based change detection methods only utilize fused high-level features from the feature encoder and thus miss the detailed representations that low-level feature pairs contain. Here we propose a multi-level change contextual refinement network (MCCRNet) to strengthen the multi-level change repres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our best model is selected from the 3 repeated tests as mentioned above, and inference with extra TTA, in which we set the inference multi-scale to be [0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0]. methods F1 score IoU score FCN+PAM (Chen, 2020a) 87.3 --CANet (Lu, 2021) 87.4 --Multibranch (Zhao, 2021) 88.04 --FODA 88.73 --MCCRNet (Ke, 2021) 90.71 --ChangeStar (Zhen, 2021) 91.25 83.92 CEECNet V2 (Diakogiannis, 2021) 91.83 84.89 FCCDN (Chen, 2021c) 92.29 85.69 MASNet (ours) 92.62 86.26…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our best model is selected from the 3 repeated tests as mentioned above, and inference with extra TTA, in which we set the inference multi-scale to be [0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2.0]. methods F1 score IoU score FCN+PAM (Chen, 2020a) 87.3 --CANet (Lu, 2021) 87.4 --Multibranch (Zhao, 2021) 88.04 --FODA 88.73 --MCCRNet (Ke, 2021) 90.71 --ChangeStar (Zhen, 2021) 91.25 83.92 CEECNet V2 (Diakogiannis, 2021) 91.83 84.89 FCCDN (Chen, 2021c) 92.29 85.69 MASNet (ours) 92.62 86.26…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [40] proposed a deep-supervised feature fusion network that fuses deep and difference features to ensure the integrity of the boundary, and introduced a deep-supervised method to train the model to alleviate the vanishing gradient problem. Ke et al [41] proposed a MCCRNet for change detection. In recent years, multi-task methods [42]- [47] have become popular, that is, to perform semantic segmentation and CD simultaneously on bitemporal remote sensing images, and the segmentation and CD can optimize and improve each other.…”
Section: Related Work a Cnn-based Rscdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing change detection methods can be divided into the image difference method [8,9], change vector analysis (CVA) [10,11], principal component analysis (PCA) [12,13], and the deep learning method [6,7,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Change Detection Of Remote Sensing Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments show that the attention module of STANet can reduce the detection error caused by improper registration of multitemporal remote sensing images. Ke et al [17] proposed a multi-level change context refinement network (MCCRNet), which introduces a change context module (CCR) to capture denser change information between dual-temporal remote sensing images. Peng et al [18] proposed a difference-enhancement dense-attention convolutional neural network (DDCNN), which combines dense attention and image difference to improve the effectiveness of the network and its accuracy in extracting the change features.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Change Detection Of Remote Sensing Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%