Proceedings of 31st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory LATTICE 2013 — PoS(LATTICE 2013) 2014
DOI: 10.22323/1.187.0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MCRG Flow for the Nonlinear Sigma Model

Abstract: A study of the renormalization group flow in the three-dimensional nonlinear O(N) sigma model using Monte Carlo Renormalization Group (MCRG) techniques is presented. To achieve this, we combine an improved blockspin transformation with the canonical demon method to determine the flow diagram for a number of different truncations. Systematic errors of the approach are highlighted. Results are discussed with hindsight on the fixed point structure of the model and the corresponding critical exponents. Special emp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the MCRG method is more stable than the FRG method and leads to more robust results for different truncations. In particular, we do not find a sudden disappearance of the non-trivial fixed point for a certain truncation including the operator S 2 (28). Furthermore, we stress that lattice techniques provide the opportunity to obtain additional information beyond the chosen truncation by a direct measurement of the Green's functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…However, the MCRG method is more stable than the FRG method and leads to more robust results for different truncations. In particular, we do not find a sudden disappearance of the non-trivial fixed point for a certain truncation including the operator S 2 (28). Furthermore, we stress that lattice techniques provide the opportunity to obtain additional information beyond the chosen truncation by a direct measurement of the Green's functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%