2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01288-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MDEmic: a metadata annotation tool to facilitate management of FAIR image data in the bioimaging community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cloud infrastructural resources are able to execute computational workflows that combine data with computational analysis tools at a large scale 42,43 . However, there is still a considerable lack of data containing machine-actionable metadata 1,3,[44][45][46][47] . To document provenance, ensure reproducibility and support reuse any raw and segmented image in this data set has been associated with a rich set of contextual and expressive metadata 48 , documenting the phenotypic characters, and recording any digital image processing (i.e., increasing contrast, brightness, image fusion) (Fig.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud infrastructural resources are able to execute computational workflows that combine data with computational analysis tools at a large scale 42,43 . However, there is still a considerable lack of data containing machine-actionable metadata 1,3,[44][45][46][47] . To document provenance, ensure reproducibility and support reuse any raw and segmented image in this data set has been associated with a rich set of contextual and expressive metadata 48 , documenting the phenotypic characters, and recording any digital image processing (i.e., increasing contrast, brightness, image fusion) (Fig.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific workflows allow to fully automate the entire process combining images with software tools utilising the machine-actionable information contained in the meta-data 42,48,67 . Meta-data has been validated using procedures described in 20,45,46 and standardised vocabularies were following the FAIR guiding principles 1 . When improved algorithms have been developed, the entire pipeline can be re-run resulting in improved segmented images without any further intervention.…”
Section: Technical Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud infrastructural resources are able to execute computational workflows that combine data with computational analysis tools at a large scale 41,42 . However, there is still a considerable lack of data containing machine-actionable meta-data 1,3,[43][44][45][46] . To foster provenance, any raw and segmented image in this data set has been associated with a rich set of contextual and expressive meta-data 47 , documenting the phenotypic attributes, and recording any digital image processing (i.e., increasing contrast, brightness, image fusion).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those efforts include the Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions (SPARC) Dataset Format ( Bandrowski et al, 2021 ), A perspective on Microscopy Metadata: data provenance and quality control ( Huisman et al, 2021 ), the Essential Metadata for 3D BRAIN Microscopy ( Ropelewski et al, 2021 ) with metadata standards for 3D microscopy datasets for use by the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative 1 and implemented in the Brain Image Library (BIL) ( Benninger et al, 2020 ), the Recommended Metadata for Biological Images (REMBI) ( Sarkans et al, 2021 ) for light and electron microscopy, the open Metadata Initiative for Neuroscience Data Structures (openMINDS) 2 and the Quality Assessment and Reproducibility for Instruments & Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) ( Boehm et al, 2021 ). Recent developments also include the 4DN-BINA-OME framework ( Hammer et al, 2021 ), a tier-based microscopy metadata specification extending the Open Microscopy Environment (OME) Data Model ( Goldberg et al, 2005 ) 3 by the 4D Nucleome Initiative (4DN) ( Dekker et al, 2017 ) 4 in collaboration with BioImaging North America (BINA), 5 along with metadata collection tools ( Kunis et al, 2021 ; Rigano et al, 2021 ; Ryan et al, 2021 ). The OME community has also been developing the Next Generation File Format (NGFF), which uses a Zarr-based format for dealing more flexibly with the different scales of microscopy data ( Moore et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%