2013
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2011.601416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MDEWMA chart: an efficient and robust alternative to monitor process dispersion

Abstract: Control chart is the most important statistical process control tool used to monitor changes in process location and dispersion. In this study, an EWMA control chart is proposed for efficient and robust monitoring of process dispersion. The proposed chart, namely the MDEWMA chart, is based on estimating the process standard deviation (σ ) using the mean absolute deviations (MD), taken from the sample median. The performance of the proposed chart has been compared with the EWMASR chart (a dispersion EWMA chart … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we will compare the performance of the proposed control chart with (Abbasi & Miller, 2013).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Control Charts With Existing Onesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we will compare the performance of the proposed control chart with (Abbasi & Miller, 2013).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Control Charts With Existing Onesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative measure that is more reliable and acceptable is the median of the run length distribution (MDRL) (Abbasi & Miller, 2013;Maravelakis et al, 2005). Usually the standard deviation of the run length distribution (SDRL) is estimated whenever the average run length is calculated (Abbasi & Miller, 2013;Maravelakis et al, 2005). In this article we used these three measures i.e.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many researchers studied EWMA control charts for variance, e.g. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%