2022
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2115326119
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MDGA1 negatively regulates amyloid precursor protein–mediated synapse inhibition in the hippocampus

Abstract: Balanced synaptic inhibition, controlled by multiple synaptic adhesion proteins, is critical for proper brain function. MDGA1 (meprin, A-5 protein, and receptor protein-tyrosine phosphatase mu [MAM] domain-containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor protein 1) suppresses synaptic inhibition in mammalian neurons, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying MDGA1-mediated negative regulation of GABAergic synapses remain unresolved. Here, we show that the MDGA1 MAM domain directly interacts with the extension doma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent data from hippocampal cultures indicated no change in mIPSC frequency or amplitude following deletion of either MDGA1 or MDGA2 (31), leading the authors to conclude that during early development, neither MDGA protein plays a role at inhibitory synapses. A further recent study in hippocampal area CA1 indicated that overexpression of WT MDGA1 and Nlgn2 binding-deficient MDGA1, but not APP binding-deficient MDGA1, causes a reduction in mIPSC frequency, while conditional deletion of MDGA1 in area CA1 had no effect on mIPSC frequency (29). These findings indicate that the effects of the MDGAs appear to depend on the experimental conditions, potentially due to differences in the ratio of MDGAs to Nlgns and other binding partners as shown previously (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recent data from hippocampal cultures indicated no change in mIPSC frequency or amplitude following deletion of either MDGA1 or MDGA2 (31), leading the authors to conclude that during early development, neither MDGA protein plays a role at inhibitory synapses. A further recent study in hippocampal area CA1 indicated that overexpression of WT MDGA1 and Nlgn2 binding-deficient MDGA1, but not APP binding-deficient MDGA1, causes a reduction in mIPSC frequency, while conditional deletion of MDGA1 in area CA1 had no effect on mIPSC frequency (29). These findings indicate that the effects of the MDGAs appear to depend on the experimental conditions, potentially due to differences in the ratio of MDGAs to Nlgns and other binding partners as shown previously (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it was recently shown that Nlgn2 is not the only target of MDGA1, and that a transsynaptic interaction between MDGA1 and APP regulates synapse function independently of Nlgn2 at GABAergic synapses formed by oriens-lacunosum moleculare (O-LM) interneurons onto the distal dendrites of pyramidal neurons in layer S.L.M. (29). It is conceivable that the additive effects of Nlgn2 / MDGA1 dKO in layer S.R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deletion of presynaptic APP from SST + interneurons reduces the density of inhibitory synapses formed by these neurons on pyramidal neurons; this is accompanied by decreases in the release probability, synaptic strength, and excitability of these interneurons. [ 62 ] In contrast, deletion of presynaptic APP from parvalbumin + interneurons produces overall marginal phenotypes [ 62 ] (Figure 2B), hinting that APP has non‐canonical functions across different synapse types, as seen for Nrxns. [ 95 ]…”
Section: Presynaptic Adhesion Molecules Regulate the Specific Propert...mentioning
confidence: 99%