2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-39967-4_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mdωπ: A Modelling Language to Build a Formal Ontology in Either Description Logics or Conceptual Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, CGs can be translated into other knowledge representation formalisms, such as semantic web languages [81] or Petri nets [82]. Finally, many links exist between CGs and DLs [22,70], which is the most common language in knowledge based applications.…”
Section: Experience-knowledge Formalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, CGs can be translated into other knowledge representation formalisms, such as semantic web languages [81] or Petri nets [82]. Finally, many links exist between CGs and DLs [22,70], which is the most common language in knowledge based applications.…”
Section: Experience-knowledge Formalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both formalisms are subsumption-centered and dedicated to the representation of terminological knowledge and assertional knowledge. There are many correspondences between DLs and CGs [6,20]. Ontologies in RDF schemas can also be translated into CGs automatically [5,11].…”
Section: Fkm: Fuzzy Knowledge Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both formalisms are subsumption-centered and dedicated to the representation of terminological knowledge and assertional knowledge. There are many correspondences between DLs and CGs [7,37]. Ontologies in RDF schemas can also be translated into CGs automatically [6,15].…”
Section: Knowledge Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%