2004
DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2004/0013-0149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean gust factors in complex terrain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 2661 gust observations in this study, the mode and median GF 5 1.5 and the mean 5 1.57 (Fig. Prognostic gust forecasting, although of high potential utility, is extremely challenging (Thorarinsdottir and Johnson 2012), in part because the relationship between GF and U is highly nonlinear and is a function of measurement height (Agustsson and Olafsson 2004;Cheng et al 2012;Krayer and Marshall 1992;Paulsen and Schroeder 2005). Although differences in averaging period confound detailed comparisons with prior studies, these values are in reasonable accord with previous estimates of GF for extratropical cyclones (Table 1) and corroborate research that has suggested that GF from extratropical cyclones may exceed those from tropical systems (Paulsen and Schroeder 2005).…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For the 2661 gust observations in this study, the mode and median GF 5 1.5 and the mean 5 1.57 (Fig. Prognostic gust forecasting, although of high potential utility, is extremely challenging (Thorarinsdottir and Johnson 2012), in part because the relationship between GF and U is highly nonlinear and is a function of measurement height (Agustsson and Olafsson 2004;Cheng et al 2012;Krayer and Marshall 1992;Paulsen and Schroeder 2005). Although differences in averaging period confound detailed comparisons with prior studies, these values are in reasonable accord with previous estimates of GF for extratropical cyclones (Table 1) and corroborate research that has suggested that GF from extratropical cyclones may exceed those from tropical systems (Paulsen and Schroeder 2005).…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Mountain waves, induced by stable tropospheric flow over terrain, are a well-known source of aviation hazards, such as strong up-and down-drafts, downslope windstorms [1][2][3][4], clear air turbulence (CAT) associated with tropospheric wave breaking [5][6][7][8][9][10], low-level turbulence and 'rotors' associated with wave-induced boundary layer separation [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and hydraulic jump-like flows [12,18], as well as hazards to surface transport [19], such as very strong or gusty winds [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is situated on the northeast fringes of the study area where strong mid-latitude cyclones (e.g., northeasters) are more frequent. Roanoke and Asheville's high frequency is also anticipated, because of their higher elevations and proximity to irregular mountain landscapes that induce more numerous gusts (Kondo et al, 2002;Agustsson and Olafsson, 2004). The lowest incidence of gusts is reported at Wilmington, NC, and Chattanooga, TN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%