1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1059-0560(99)00004-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean reversion and volatility of short-term London Interbank Offer Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even Chan et al (1992) reported a t-statistic of 1.54 for  , which is not statistically significant at any conventional level, assuming the asymptotic normality of the t-ratio for  . Adkins and Krehbiel (1999) found that neither the 3-month nor 6-month LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) was mean reverting. Treepongkaruna and Gray (2003) reported that the 4 mean reversion of daily short-term interest rate data was not statistically significant at the 5 percent level in any of the eight countries they examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Even Chan et al (1992) reported a t-statistic of 1.54 for  , which is not statistically significant at any conventional level, assuming the asymptotic normality of the t-ratio for  . Adkins and Krehbiel (1999) found that neither the 3-month nor 6-month LIBOR (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) was mean reverting. Treepongkaruna and Gray (2003) reported that the 4 mean reversion of daily short-term interest rate data was not statistically significant at the 5 percent level in any of the eight countries they examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Let us note that their result is not universal, e.g. in [1], using the same estimation methodology but for LIBOR rates, γ was estimated to be less than unity (which means that volatility is less than proportional to short rate, unlike in the result due to Chan, Karolyi, Longstaff and Sanders). Approximate formulae for bond prices when the short rate follows (1.6) has been developed recently by [4] and [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…φ(t) = ȧ(t)/(a(t)B(t)). Then, (2.11) and so the right hand side is constant with respect to t. Hence for any t it equals φ(T ) + 1 2 Ω 2 (r)B(T ) = φ(T ), which is a constant denoted by K. We have…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One approach in the literature is to use time series data and examples include Chan, Karolyi, Longstaff, and Sanders (1992), Tse (1995), Hiraki and Takezawa (1997), Brenner, Harjes, and Kroner (1996), Dahlquist (1996), Adkins and Krehbiel (1999), Nowman (1997Nowman ( , 2006, Episcopos (2000), Fernandez (2001), Bali (2000Bali ( , 2003, Nowman and Saltoğlu (2003), Nowman and Sorwar (2005), Sun (2005), Bali and Wu (2006), Faff and Gray (2006), Treepongkaruna and Gray (2006), Czellar, Karolyi, and Ronchetti (2007), Nowman and Yahia (2008), Christiansen (2008), Hong, Lin, and Wang (2010) and Reschreiter (2010). Another approach uses panel data and the Kalman Filtering methods and examples include Jegadeesh and Pennacchi (1996), Geyer and Pichler (1999), Duan and Simonato (1999), De Jong (2000), Chen and Scott (2003), Chatterjee (2004), Driessen, Melenberg, and Nijman (2005), O'Sullivan (2007), and Date and Wang (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%