2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-5316(02)00033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean value and tail distribution of the message delay in statistical multiplexers with correlated train arrivals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger values of K imply that ON slots and OFF slots occur more clustered together in time and the arrival process is more bursty. The correlation parameter K is therefore also referred to as the burstiness factor or the burst-length factor of the arrival process [12,21]. Further, unless otherwise stated, we assume that the service times have a so-called shifted geometric distribution, i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger values of K imply that ON slots and OFF slots occur more clustered together in time and the arrival process is more bursty. The correlation parameter K is therefore also referred to as the burstiness factor or the burst-length factor of the arrival process [12,21]. Further, unless otherwise stated, we assume that the service times have a so-called shifted geometric distribution, i.e.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger values of K imply that on-slots and off-slots occur more clustered together in time and the arrival process is more bursty. The correlation parameter K is therefore also referred to as the burstiness factor or the burst-length factor of the arrival process [24], [25]. As transmission times have a fixed length of 1 slot, the load ρ is equal to ρ = λσ.…”
Section: Practical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some situations, random theory has been applied to deal with this uncertain queuing problem data. For example, the servicing and arrival rates have been usually considered stochastic distributions (De Vuyst et al., ; Ivnitski, ). Although it is well known that random modeling techniques are useful tools in dealing with queuing problem uncertainty, in the real world, there are many nonprobabilistic factors that affect large‐scale hydropower construction projects, and therefore, fuzzy theory is more suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%