2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1806.08005
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mean-Variance Efficiency of Optimal Power and Logarithmic Utility Portfolios

Abstract: We derive new results related to the portfolio choice problem for power and logarithmic utilities. Assuming that the portfolio returns follow an approximate log-normal distribution, the closed-form expressions of the optimal portfolio weights are obtained for both utility functions. Moreover, we prove that both optimal portfolios belong to the set of mean-variance feasible portfolios and establish necessary and sufficient conditions such that they are mean-variance efficient. Furthermore, an application to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof of Lemma 1. According to Bodnar et al (2018), assuming that µ > 0 and σ/µ → 0, the difference between the distribution functions of N (µ, σ 2 ) and ln N ln µ, σ 2 µ 2 approaches zero.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proof of Lemma 1. According to Bodnar et al (2018), assuming that µ > 0 and σ/µ → 0, the difference between the distribution functions of N (µ, σ 2 ) and ln N ln µ, σ 2 µ 2 approaches zero.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can find it as the typical solution for the investment strategies for different types of utility functions (see Bodnar et al, 2015a,b). However, most of the time it is hard to succeed and in order to derive an analytical solution it is required to have some sort of specific assumptions because of the difficulty to perform the calculations (see Bodnar et al, 2015bBodnar et al, , 2018Campbell and Viceira, 2002). On the other hand, one can always use numerical or approximative results if no information on returns is considered (see Brandt et al, 2005;Broadie and Shen, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation