2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meanfield modeling of propofol-induced changes in spontaneous EEG rhythms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
85
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
11
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that there is still spatial dependence based on the incoming connections over the white matter tracts in the network (Equation (2a)). Values for all constants can be found in Supporting Information, Table S1 and are the same parameters as used to simulate resting‐state activity in previous studies (Hindriks & van Putten 2012, 2013; Robinson et al, 2002), with the only exception that we increased vei to account for the extra excitatory input from the network. Simulations based on the cortico‐thalamic mean‐field model were performed using the Euler–Maruyama method with an integration time step of 1 × 10 −4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there is still spatial dependence based on the incoming connections over the white matter tracts in the network (Equation (2a)). Values for all constants can be found in Supporting Information, Table S1 and are the same parameters as used to simulate resting‐state activity in previous studies (Hindriks & van Putten 2012, 2013; Robinson et al, 2002), with the only exception that we increased vei to account for the extra excitatory input from the network. Simulations based on the cortico‐thalamic mean‐field model were performed using the Euler–Maruyama method with an integration time step of 1 × 10 −4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extending the model to include inhibition of inhibition is justified because previous anesthesia modelling studies have suggested that inhibition of the inhibitory population by itself at the cortical level is important for describing the EEG changes linked to anesthesia (Bojak & Liley, 2005;Hindriks & van Putten, 2012). Two types of extensions were considered.…”
Section: Error Analysis Of Extensions Of the Jr Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, neural mass or neural field model (Deco et al, 2008) approaches that attempt to take into account the meso-/macro-scale neurophysiology involved in the generation of EEG at rest and during anesthesia (Bojak & Liley, 2005;McCarthy et al, 2008;Ching et al, 2010;Steyn-Ross et al, 2012;Hindriks & van Putten, 2012;Hutt, 2013;20 Hutt & Buhry, 2014) present an interesting alternative to tracking the anesthetic brain state, while simultaneously allowing for estimation of underlying physiological variables that may have clinical significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations