Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org..Wiley-Blackwell and Wesleyan University are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to History and Theory.My aim is to consider what I take to be the basic question which necessarily arises whenever an historian of ideas' confronts a work which he hopes to understand. Such an historian may have focused his attention on a work of literaturea poem, a play, a novelor on a work of philosophysome exercise in ethical, political, religious, or other such mode of thought. But the basic question will in all such cases remain the same: what are the appropriate procedures to adopt in the attempt to arrive at an understanding of the work? There are of course two currently orthodox (though conflicting) answers to this question, both of which seem to command a wide acceptance. The first (which is perhaps being increasingly adopted by historians of ideas) insists that it is the context "of religious, political, and economic factors" which determines the meaning of any given text, and so must provide "the ultimate framework" for any attempt to understand it. The other orthodoxy, however, (still perhaps the most generally accepted) insists on the autonomy of the text itself as the sole necessary key to its own meaning, and so dismisses any attempt to reconstitute the "total context" as "gratuitous, and worse."My concern in what follows will be to consider these two orthodoxies in turn, and to argue that both in effect share the same basic inadequacy: 3.

Beyond citizen and subject: New perspectives on political thought, “tribe,” and “indirect rule” in Africa

“…The illocutionary force is only garnered from an appreciation of the "linguistic context" for it is here that the prevalent ideological attitudes of the day are to be found and whether the author is endorsing or challenging them (Skinner, 1969). However, where the history of colonial thought is concerned, we must remember that as political practitioners, district officials and governors were not engaged in the sort of abstract argumentation within a narrow philosophical canon in the way that major theorists like Hobbes were.…”

«Gobernar el Mundo». La polémica <em>Mare Liberum versus Mare Clausum</em> en las Indias Orientales (1603-1625)

“…9 Brito, 2003, 362. Gómez Rivas, 2013 10 Véanse las todavía originales observaciones de teoría y método formuladas por Skinner, 1969. Asimismo, resulta obligada la lectura de la compilación de ensayos de Pocock, 2011.…”

El significado de la Teoría Política: gestión de cambios estructurales e innovación política

“…Pertenece igualmente a este período el artículo de Q. Skinner (1969), quien es considerado como el precursor de la reflexión metodológica en torno a la interpretación de textos en la Historia de la Teoría Política 21 . Desde el punto de vista de reconocimiento institucional de la disciplina, al final de esta etapa se deja en segundo plano, y por utilizar la distinción de J. C. Gunnell (1983), la concepción de la TP como subcampo de la CP, como discusión acerca del método.…”