2014
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciu354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measles Vaccination in the Presence or Absence of Maternal Measles Antibody: Impact on Child Survival

Abstract: In 2-dose trials, early measles vaccination at 4–6 months in presence of maternal measles antibody was associated with significantly better survival to age 5 years than vaccination in absence of measles antibody. Confounding factors did not explain the effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
69
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
69
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Infants given early MV in the presence of maternal antibody had a marked survival advantage that only became apparent after a booster dose of MV was given at 9 months of age (Aaby et al, 2014). Animal studies have shown that a previous viral infection may lower viral replication of a subsequent heterologous viral infections due to stimulation of T-cell cross reactivity (Selin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants given early MV in the presence of maternal antibody had a marked survival advantage that only became apparent after a booster dose of MV was given at 9 months of age (Aaby et al, 2014). Animal studies have shown that a previous viral infection may lower viral replication of a subsequent heterologous viral infections due to stimulation of T-cell cross reactivity (Selin et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As randomization was stratified for maturity (≥37 weeks of gestation vs <37 weeks); all results were presented by maturity. As previous studies of nonspecific effects have emphasized children with atopic predisposition, and shown differential effects by sex and by maternal immunity, we prespecified analyses of the main outcome stratified by these subgroups, as well as by factors previously associated with the development of atopic diseases (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 From this perspective, the ‘true’ effect of an intervention is the measured reduction in overall mortality/morbidity under a certain set of specified conditions in relation to other interventions affecting mortality. For example, the optimal effect of early MV at 4.5 months of age was obtained when children were primed with OPV0 (and BCG) in the first weeks of life (this study), did not receive NVAS,3 did not receive campaign-OPV before (this study), did not receive DTP after early MV3 and did receive MV in the presence of maternal antibodies 20. When altering these conditions, and other potential priming conditions that we do not know about yet, the ‘true’ effect is no longer observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%