2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2013.6610417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measure oriented cost-sensitive SVM for 3D nodule detection

Abstract: Abstract-The class imbalance issue occurs when training a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for nodules. This imbalance causes poor prediction performance for true nodules. Moreover, the misclassification costs are different between two classes and high sensitivity of true nodules is essential in the detection. In order to eliminate or reduce the false positives while keeping high sensitivity, we present an effective wrapper framework incorporating the evaluation measure of imbalanced data into the objecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, no further reduction of the training data was made. Another effective strategy for reducing the negative influence of imbalanced data is to separately optimize the pair of cost parameters of SVM models at the same time [ 52 ], particularly the cost for the errors on the positive samples compared to negative ones. In the development of SVM models, due to the very high diversity of each training dataset (containing 7613~46,223 proteins), both the separate and uniform cost parameter optimization scheme led to very high cost parameters for both positive and negative samples that achieve similar levels of prediction performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, no further reduction of the training data was made. Another effective strategy for reducing the negative influence of imbalanced data is to separately optimize the pair of cost parameters of SVM models at the same time [ 52 ], particularly the cost for the errors on the positive samples compared to negative ones. In the development of SVM models, due to the very high diversity of each training dataset (containing 7613~46,223 proteins), both the separate and uniform cost parameter optimization scheme led to very high cost parameters for both positive and negative samples that achieve similar levels of prediction performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%