2005
DOI: 10.1080/0729436052000318541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
164
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
15
164
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a lack of engagement in direct patient care inhibits student's ability to achieve learning objectives in the learning environment [8] . The learning environment refers to the social, psychological and pedagogical contexts in which learning occurs, which affects student achievement and attitudes and to the contextual factors which influence the way that learning is approached [9,10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a lack of engagement in direct patient care inhibits student's ability to achieve learning objectives in the learning environment [8] . The learning environment refers to the social, psychological and pedagogical contexts in which learning occurs, which affects student achievement and attitudes and to the contextual factors which influence the way that learning is approached [9,10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include such variables as spending time in the campus (Nauffal, 2011), maintaining intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (Hufton, Elliott and Illushin, 2002;Saeed and Zyngier, 2012), achieving project-based and problem-based learning (Ahlfeldt, Mehta and Sellnow, 2005;Schlechty, 2001), sports clubs, tournaments and sports and gymnasium classes (Angus Busby, 2011), curiosity, interest, studentcentered teaching, cooperative and interactive learning (Ang and Wang, 2006;Bouta et al 2012;Chickering and Gamson, 1987;Neal, 2010), faculty-student interaction (Neal, 2010), lecturer-student relationship, group works, interesting learning activities, making learning important and valuable (Steele and Fullagar, 2009;Zyngier, 2007) and the teacher's effort to teach (Saeed and Zyngier, 2012). Beer, Clark and Jones (2010) determined the factors influencing student engagement as teacher participation, course design, class size, students' gender and students' age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, research on the use of active learning techniques in classroom instruction-incorporation of problem-based learning, collaborative and cooperative activities-has been found to increase student motivation to learn, student engagement and improved learning (Ahlfeldt, Mehta, & Sellnow, 2005;Cavanagh, 2011;Cherney, 2008;Hake, 1998;Kuh, 2009;Prince, 2004;Terenzini et al, 2001;Yoder & Hochevar, 2005). Research has also shown that instructors who communicate high expectations for student learning and engagement and develop courses that reflect and support those expectations can promote deep approaches to learning (Baeten, Kyndt, Struyven, & Dochy, 2010;Entwistle & McClune, 2004;Fyrenius, Wirell, & Silen, 2007).…”
Section: Level Of Academic Challengementioning
confidence: 99%