2012
DOI: 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2012.2.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redesigning a Large Lecture Course for Student Engagement: Process and Outcomes

Abstract: Using an action-research approach, a large-lecture science course (240 students) was redesigned to improve student engagement in the areas of active and collaborative learning, faculty-student interaction and level of academic challenge. This was mainly achieved through the addition of a half-semester long group project, which replaced half of the lectures and the final exam. The course redesign did not result in more hours spent on teaching and teaching-related activities (grading, assessment preparation, lec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several large scale studies at post secondary institutions have supported the idea that student engagement in response to the delivery of the curriculum is as important as the actual content of the curriculum in determining student outcomes (Astin, 1993;Light, 2001;Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005). The unique problems of engaging students in large undergraduate classes have been noted in many publications (e.g., Allen, Duch, & Groh, 1996;Klegeris & Hurren, 2011;Long & Qin, 2014;MacGregor, Cooper, Smith, & Robinson, 2000;Murray & Summerlee, 2007;Pastirik, 2006;Reid, 2012). Several pedagogical practices have been used to increase student engagement such as problem-based learning, small group collaborative problem solving, and undergraduate research (Macgregor et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several large scale studies at post secondary institutions have supported the idea that student engagement in response to the delivery of the curriculum is as important as the actual content of the curriculum in determining student outcomes (Astin, 1993;Light, 2001;Pascarella & Terenzini, 2005). The unique problems of engaging students in large undergraduate classes have been noted in many publications (e.g., Allen, Duch, & Groh, 1996;Klegeris & Hurren, 2011;Long & Qin, 2014;MacGregor, Cooper, Smith, & Robinson, 2000;Murray & Summerlee, 2007;Pastirik, 2006;Reid, 2012). Several pedagogical practices have been used to increase student engagement such as problem-based learning, small group collaborative problem solving, and undergraduate research (Macgregor et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various engagement metrics have been utilized and proposed in the literature to measure/identify the student engagement levels [17][18][19]. To determine the student engagement levels, "Classroom Survey of Student Engagement (CLASSE)" model was used in addition to frequency-based metrics that were proposed in the study [17]. CLASSE measured questions asked, participation, interactions with the instructor, and time spent on the course.…”
Section: Student Engagement and Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to measure/identify the engagement level of students, different engagement metrics have been used and proposed in the literature [33]- [35]. Reid used the "Classroom Survey of Student Engagement (CLASSE)" model and proposed frequency-related metrics to determine the engagement level of the students [33]. The metrics considered were: number of questions asked, number of participations, number of interactions with instructor, and time spent on the course.…”
Section: Related Work and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%