2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and Detection of Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
236
0
65

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
236
0
65
Order By: Relevance
“…, the efficiency term ξj(X,μs), which brings into play the attenuation coefficient μs, is the only variable that depends on the tracer position and the most challenging term to evaluate. By definition, the efficiency is the fraction of emitted gamma rays that hit a given detector as they travel across the system . As there is no analytical solution for this efficiency, except in some simple cases, a Monte Carlo technique has been devised to compute it …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, the efficiency term ξj(X,μs), which brings into play the attenuation coefficient μs, is the only variable that depends on the tracer position and the most challenging term to evaluate. By definition, the efficiency is the fraction of emitted gamma rays that hit a given detector as they travel across the system . As there is no analytical solution for this efficiency, except in some simple cases, a Monte Carlo technique has been devised to compute it …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, it should be able to predict event counts resulting from two tracers located at two given positions. In fact, because of the dead time of the acquisition system, the superposition property does not hold for the measured event counts . However, this property is still correct for the actual event count rate associated to detector j Nj(A,B)(bold-italicXnormalA,bold-italicXnormalB)=NjnormalA(bold-italicXnormalA)+NjnormalB(bold-italicXnormalB) where Nj(A,B)true(bold-italicXnormalA,bold-italicXnormalBtrue) is the actual event count rate resulting from both tracers A and B at positions bold-italicXnormalA and bold-italicXnormalB, with respect to detector j.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source self-absorption will result in a reduction of kinetic energy of emitted electrons in addition to altering their number. To estimate self-absorption effect we assumed that the source was a uniform deposit of radioisotope Ni-63 emitting beta particles of a specific activity A s and the emitted particles followed a known attenuation law [18]. Apparent activity of a source without backscattering is related to source thickness according to the following law…”
Section: A Source Self-absorption Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A photon can interact with matter mainly via three processes: the photoelectric effect, the Compton scattering, and the pair production-annihilation [10]. Through these phenomena, the energy of the γ rays is deposited in a given material in the form of kinetic energy of electrons.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%