2002
DOI: 10.1080/00140130210166915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement and the practising ergonomist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because workload is a construct that is internal to a worker,84 85 some argue ‘there is no other way to measure such concepts as workload … directly unless we ask the participant.’86 What is most important in respect to measuring subjective workload is intersubjectivity, or, roughly, the degree to which multiple respondents interpret the questions of the measurement instrument in a similar way 87. The current study took several steps to achieve acceptable intersubjectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because workload is a construct that is internal to a worker,84 85 some argue ‘there is no other way to measure such concepts as workload … directly unless we ask the participant.’86 What is most important in respect to measuring subjective workload is intersubjectivity, or, roughly, the degree to which multiple respondents interpret the questions of the measurement instrument in a similar way 87. The current study took several steps to achieve acceptable intersubjectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a strength because of the insight into a person’s cognitive load that comes from subjective assessment: “there is no other way to measure such concepts as workload … directly unless we ask the participant”80 Additionally, the safety science literature suggests that safety-related behavior is often driven by safety perceptions (e.g., perceived error likelihood) 81, 82. Nevertheless, physiological, cognitive task analytic, and other methods are available to measure workload, and observation, chart review, and simulation studies can be carried out to measure medication safety outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Too often, seat system design teams, in their quest to obtain design feedback, succumb to the temptation of throwing together a questionnaire on the back of an envelope with no guarantee of validity (Drury 2002). This is done because automobile seat comfort, as a science, lacks a coherent, universally accepted definition (Baber 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%