2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610216000594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement equivalence across gender and education in the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling elderly Taiwanese

Abstract: The WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version is appropriate for combined use and for comparisons in older people across gender and different educational levels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A substantial DIF item indicates that the item description has different difficulties for different subgroups of respondents (different genders in this study). 42 We adopted the usual method to identify DIF items: a DIF contrast (ie, the difference of difficulty between 2 groups) of greater than 0.5 suggests a substantial DIF. 43 We examined the relationship between MARS-5 and the MPR using the Pearson correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A substantial DIF item indicates that the item description has different difficulties for different subgroups of respondents (different genders in this study). 42 We adopted the usual method to identify DIF items: a DIF contrast (ie, the difference of difficulty between 2 groups) of greater than 0.5 suggests a substantial DIF. 43 We examined the relationship between MARS-5 and the MPR using the Pearson correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To fairly assess item scores across subgroups, DIF should be tested before combining or comparing the subgroups" scores. 42 Because no DIF items were displayed, combining or comparing the MARS-5 scores of older male and female stroke patients is acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher score indicates a higher QoL [23]. In addition to its good psychometric properties in the general Taiwanese population (α = 0.70–0.77), the WHOQOL-BREF had satisfactory reliability and validity in populations with psychiatric problems [24, 25], with cancer [26], and with geriatric problems [27]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if we find associations between the Affiliate Stigma Scale and the criteria, we can claim satisfactory concurrent validity for the Affiliate Stigma Scale. Also, these instruments were well developed and have sound psychometric properties [1827]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Análisis Rasch del WHOQOL-BREF en adultos mayores de Bucaramanga y Manizales En el caso particular del WHOQOL-BREF se encuentran varios estudios sobre sus propiedades psicométricas en adultos mayores (Castro, Driusso, & Oishi, 2014;Chachamovich, Trentini, & Fleck, 2007;Chien, Wang, Yao, Hsueh, & Hsieh, 2009;Chien, Wang, Yao, Sheu, & Hsieh, 2007;Eser, Saatli, Eser, Baydur, & Fidaner, 2010;Espinoza, Osorio, Torrejón, Lucas-Carrasco, & Bunout, 2011;Fleck, Chachamovich, & Trentini, 2006;Gholami et al, 2016;Leplège et al, 2013;Lin, Li, Lin, & Chen, 2016;Lucas-Carrasco, 2012;Mello dos Santos, Hugo, Leal, & Hilgert, 2013;Silva, Soares, Santos, & Silva, 2014;Vilar, Sousa, & Simões, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified