2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement equivalence of the Wong and Law Emotional Intelligence Scale across cultures: An item response theory approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Question-items for cultural intelligence were adapted from the cultural intelligence scale (CQS) developed by Van Dyne, Ang, and Koh (2008) and used by Bucker, Furrer and Lin (2015). Further, the question-items for emotional intelligence were culled from then emotional intelligence scale formed by Wong and Law (2002) and employed by LaPalme, Wang, Joseph, Saklofske and Yan (2016). Lastly, the question-items used to measure the cross-cultural adjustment of Filipino expatriates were derived from the paper of Ward and Kennedy (1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Question-items for cultural intelligence were adapted from the cultural intelligence scale (CQS) developed by Van Dyne, Ang, and Koh (2008) and used by Bucker, Furrer and Lin (2015). Further, the question-items for emotional intelligence were culled from then emotional intelligence scale formed by Wong and Law (2002) and employed by LaPalme, Wang, Joseph, Saklofske and Yan (2016). Lastly, the question-items used to measure the cross-cultural adjustment of Filipino expatriates were derived from the paper of Ward and Kennedy (1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trait model (or trait EI) is contextualized within the personality framework and is evaluated through self-reported measures of behavior (e.g., Bar-On, 1997; Salovey et al, 1995). Ability EI measures attempt to capture the latent ability to perceive, use, understand, and regulate emotions (La Palme et al, 2016). Since trait EI is conceptualized as “a constellation of emotion-related self-perceptions and dispositions at the lower levels of personality hierarchies” (Petrides et al, 2007b, p. 26), it is considered as the shared affective variance within the personality domain that is sampled by lower order facets (Siegling et al, 2015) such as adaptability and empathy.…”
Section: Commonly Used Models Of Emotional Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is mixed evidence in the research literature regarding cross-cultural comparisons of trait EI levels in more individualistic versus collectivistic countries (e.g., LaPalme et al, 2016). For example, Gökçen et al (2014) found that British participants scored higher on global trait EI and on the four factors associated with the TEIQue compared to Chinese participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a construct is invariant across groups, it indicates that the different groups are attributing the same meaning to that construct (Putnick and Bornstein, 2016). Establishing cross-cultural invariance is important for comparisons across cultures on some construct (Mullen, 1995; Libbrecht et al, 2014; LaPalme et al, 2016). While factorial equivalence can be demonstrated within multiple cultures, it does not ensure measurement invariance of the measured construct across cultures (Byrne and Campbell, 1999; Byrne and Watkins, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%