2002
DOI: 10.1080/14616730210154225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of adult attachment: The place of self-report and interview methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing data suggest that attachment styles and internal working models of attachment are only moderately related (Crowell, Fraley, & Shaver, 1999;Shaver, Belsky, & Brennan, 2000), and more research is needed to investigate whether these two different methodologies measure the same construct (Jacobvitz, Curran, & Moller, 2002). The present study utilized the Adult Attachment Interview to assess adolescents' internal working models or their state of mind with respect to attachment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing data suggest that attachment styles and internal working models of attachment are only moderately related (Crowell, Fraley, & Shaver, 1999;Shaver, Belsky, & Brennan, 2000), and more research is needed to investigate whether these two different methodologies measure the same construct (Jacobvitz, Curran, & Moller, 2002). The present study utilized the Adult Attachment Interview to assess adolescents' internal working models or their state of mind with respect to attachment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…posteriormente, las investigaciones se extrapolaron a otras etapas del desarrollo, iniciándose una importante tradición en la medición del apego adulto, lo que ha implicado complejidades y desafíos a los investigadores, ya que los estudios han surgido desde distintas áreas de la psicología y, por lo mismo, han realizado énfasis diversos en la conceptualización del apego adulto, en la forma de evaluar, en el foco de la evaluación, en el tipo de instrumentos utilizados, etc. (Bartholomew, 1994;Bifulco, 2002;Feeney, Noller y Hanrahan, 1994;Griffin y Bartholomew, 1994;Harris, 2002;Hazan y Shaver, 1994;Jacobvitz, Curran y Moller, 2002;Mikulincer y shaver, 2007;roisman et al, 2007;Shaver y Mikulincer, 2002;Stein, Jacobs, Ferguson, Allen y Fonagy, 1998).…”
Section: Evaluación Del Apego Adultounclassified
“…An in-depth interview is useful to obtain the detail information like opinion from the expert or to explore some new issues comprehensively. It gives the researchers the chance to get the complete descriptions about the researched issues (Boyce & Neale, 2006). To ensure that the interview is successful, the researchers have to feel the condition of the people interviewed, and be more flexible on some certain things during the interview (Berry, 1999).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%