1998
DOI: 10.1080/0954412988325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of business excellence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
13

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
94
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Those provided in this paper are related frameworks which underlie the performance measurement system (PMS) proposed in this study. A more comprehensive list of performance measures include: performance measurement questionnaire (PMQ) (Dixon, Nanni & Vollmann, 1990); strategic measurement analysis and reporting technique (SMART) (Lynch & Cross, 1991); the results and determinants matrix (R&DM) (Fitzgerald, Johnson, Brignall, Silvestro & Vos, 1991); the balanced scorecard (BSC) (Kaplan & Norton, 1996); consistent performance measurement systems (CPMS) (Flapper, Fortuin & Stoop, 1996); integrated performance measurement systems (IPMS) (Bititci, Carrie & McDevitt, 1997), comparative business scorecard (CBS) (Kanji, 1998); integrated PM framework (IPMF) (Medori, 1998), the Cambridge performance measurement process (CPMP) (Bourne, Mills, Wilcox, Nelly & Platts, 2000); dynamic performance measurement systems (DPMS) (Bititci, Turner & Begemann, 2000) and The South African Construction Excellence Model (SACEM) (Dlungwana et al, 2002). Despite these large number of measures, researchers demand more effective frameworks that will ensure that organisations' measures of performance emanate from their strategic decisions (Price, 2003).…”
Section: Developing a Performance Measurement System (Pms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those provided in this paper are related frameworks which underlie the performance measurement system (PMS) proposed in this study. A more comprehensive list of performance measures include: performance measurement questionnaire (PMQ) (Dixon, Nanni & Vollmann, 1990); strategic measurement analysis and reporting technique (SMART) (Lynch & Cross, 1991); the results and determinants matrix (R&DM) (Fitzgerald, Johnson, Brignall, Silvestro & Vos, 1991); the balanced scorecard (BSC) (Kaplan & Norton, 1996); consistent performance measurement systems (CPMS) (Flapper, Fortuin & Stoop, 1996); integrated performance measurement systems (IPMS) (Bititci, Carrie & McDevitt, 1997), comparative business scorecard (CBS) (Kanji, 1998); integrated PM framework (IPMF) (Medori, 1998), the Cambridge performance measurement process (CPMP) (Bourne, Mills, Wilcox, Nelly & Platts, 2000); dynamic performance measurement systems (DPMS) (Bititci, Turner & Begemann, 2000) and The South African Construction Excellence Model (SACEM) (Dlungwana et al, 2002). Despite these large number of measures, researchers demand more effective frameworks that will ensure that organisations' measures of performance emanate from their strategic decisions (Price, 2003).…”
Section: Developing a Performance Measurement System (Pms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crosby, 1989;Deming, 1986;Kanji, 1998;Oakland, 2000;Rao et al, 1996;& Spring et al, 1998). To this end, successful consumer retention and market breakthrough lies in the idea and realization of consumer satisfaction www.ccsenet.org/ijbm International Journal of Business and Management Vol.…”
Section: Customer Focus and Quality Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality has now become one of the key variables of competitiveness that companies should incorporate into their corporate strategy. Kanji (1998) determined that the principles or critical success factors are the key areas of the organization which, when properly managed, ensure improvement of competitiveness and business excellence. In the literature on the subject, it has been shown that for a Total Quality Management implementation to be successful, the principles of quality or critical factors must be taken into account (Zhang, 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%