2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:11<1706::aid-mus6>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of central activation failure of the quadriceps femoris in healthy adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
99
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(54 reference statements)
6
99
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A CAR of 1.0 indicates complete activation of the MN pool (Stackhouse et al, 2000;Lewek et al, 2004). CAR ranges in healthy subjects were previously reported as 0.93-0.99 (Lewek et al, 2004) and 0.95-0.98 (Verbunt et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A CAR of 1.0 indicates complete activation of the MN pool (Stackhouse et al, 2000;Lewek et al, 2004). CAR ranges in healthy subjects were previously reported as 0.93-0.99 (Lewek et al, 2004) and 0.95-0.98 (Verbunt et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…AL may also be influenced by the actual methodology. Indeed, linear (Norregaard 1997) as well as curvilinear relationships between AL and voluntary torque are commonly obtained (Belanger and McComas 1981;Behm et al 1996;Stackhouse et al 2000). According to Loring and Hershenson (1992), such a nonlinear shape could be due to an increased compliance during sub-maximal voluntary efforts, therefore underestimating the resultant AL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Our results indicated that activation level played no role in explaining the bone strength. There seemed to be some variation in activation level among individuals, but evidently activation level is not a major determinative factor in force production in young adults (Merton 1954;Oskouei et al 2003;Stackhouse et al 2000). As has been shown previously, our results suggest that, in addition to variation in muscle volume, there is significant inter-individual variation in specific tension (Ikai and Fukunaga 1968;Maughan and Nimmo 1984), which also plays a role in determining the bone strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%