2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
166
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
18
166
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained result that a change in the distortedness of the chord (distorted vs. nondistorted) elicited larger and earlier change-related responses than a change in the harmonic structure (dyad vs. triad) is in line with previous research demonstrating larger and earlier MMN and P3a responses to perceptually larger deviants (Ford et al, 1976;Jaramillo et al, 2000;Novitski et al, 2004;Pakarinen et al, 2007). Varying the level of distortion in the chords clearly causes a large perceptual contrast evident in the auditory signal waveform, compared to the more subtle change elicited by a change in the harmonic structure (e.g., adding or omitting the third interval).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The obtained result that a change in the distortedness of the chord (distorted vs. nondistorted) elicited larger and earlier change-related responses than a change in the harmonic structure (dyad vs. triad) is in line with previous research demonstrating larger and earlier MMN and P3a responses to perceptually larger deviants (Ford et al, 1976;Jaramillo et al, 2000;Novitski et al, 2004;Pakarinen et al, 2007). Varying the level of distortion in the chords clearly causes a large perceptual contrast evident in the auditory signal waveform, compared to the more subtle change elicited by a change in the harmonic structure (e.g., adding or omitting the third interval).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In order for MMN to become a useful tool for clinical practice, it needs to be reliably measurable in individual patients (McGee et al, 1997;Ponton et al, 1997;Ha et al, 2003;Marco-Pallarés et al, 2005). Näätänen et al (2004) have developed an ''optimal" MMN paradigm that yields a multifaceted profile of auditory discrimination abilities with a recording time of approximately 15 min (see also Pakarinen et al, 2007). The deviant tones differ from the standard tones on one of five possible attributes: duration, frequency, spatial location, intensity, or by having a sound gap in the middle of the tone (see Table 1 for stimulus details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that the use of smaller deviants would have revealed group differences in the MMN response to non-temporal deviants. To overrule this possibility, a parametric study utilizing several deviance magnitudes for each deviant feature would be needed (Pakarinen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Mismatch Negativity -Deviant Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%