2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-016-0127-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of heart rate variability using off-the-shelf smart phones

Abstract: Background The cardiac parameters, such as heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), are very important physiological data for daily healthcare. Recently, the camera-based photoplethysmography techniques have been proposed for HR measurement. These techniques allow us to estimate the HR contactlessly with low-cost camera. However, the previous works showed limit success for estimating HRV because the R–R intervals, the primary data for HRV calculation, are sensitive to noise and artifacts.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to obtain a cardiac motion-related signal during image acquisition allows us to further obtain a surrogate signal for the successive RR intervals from the cardiac motion signal [30]; that surrogate signal can be used to sort patients into non-arrhythmic patients and arrhythmic patients, using the global variation of RR intervals [31, 32]. We can then incorporate this data into the reconstruction process, effectively using a total of 5 dimensions (2 spatial and 3 physiologic, including an additional dimension corresponding to the preceding RR interval for each cardiac cycle acquired), with an associated improvement in the reconstructed image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to obtain a cardiac motion-related signal during image acquisition allows us to further obtain a surrogate signal for the successive RR intervals from the cardiac motion signal [30]; that surrogate signal can be used to sort patients into non-arrhythmic patients and arrhythmic patients, using the global variation of RR intervals [31, 32]. We can then incorporate this data into the reconstruction process, effectively using a total of 5 dimensions (2 spatial and 3 physiologic, including an additional dimension corresponding to the preceding RR interval for each cardiac cycle acquired), with an associated improvement in the reconstructed image quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heart rate variability calculation Multiple metrics can be computed to express the measure of heart rate variability in different units. In this work, we focus on one of the most popular time-domain metric for summarizing HRV called the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) [10,13,18], expressed in units of time. As the name suggests, this is computed by calculating the root mean square of time difference between adjacent IBIs: The example from VicarPPG dataset shows the RoI overlaid on the face.…”
Section: Output Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HR (bpm) 0.7 ± 0.72 4.57 ± 8.87 0.16 ± 0.11 0.77 ± 0.76 0.12 ± 0.06 0.18 ± 0.26 0.288 ± 0.56 0.32 ± 0.7 HRV RMSSD (ms)10.54 ± 8.20 7.15 ± 5.39 10.59 ± 7.73 27.55 ± 15.56 11.98 ± 7.67 14.02± 8.46 12.07 ± 6.63 23.82± 13.59 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there have been several reported techniques for increasing the accuracy of smartphone PPG, such as point-of-interest selection [27], bandpass filtering [28], adaptive signal thresholding [29], motion detection techniques [30][31][32], interpolation techniques [33], and signal decomposition methods [34][35][36]. Bioengineering studies indicate that the average HR [37] and HRV measured using smartphone PPG are comparable with those measured using gold standard ECGs [21,28,[38][39][40].Although it is a promising solution for practical data collection and has an accuracy that has been well proved in several experiments, using smartphone PPG to measure HRV has received limited research attention in applied disciplines such as medicine or psychology [41]; a possible explanation is the lack of robustness in practical scenarios. When smartphone users measure their heartbeats outside a laboratory environment, slight hand movements or ambient light changes can corrupt the PPG signals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%