Oil Spill Remediation 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118825662.ch14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Interfacial Tension in Hydrocarbon/Water/Dispersant Systems at Deepwater Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The insignificant effect implied that CDO droplets, once fully dispersed, may not have a remarkable variation in size. The result was an agreement with the negligible effect of the pressure on droplet size distribution of crude oil in Deepwater as well as the assumptions (Abdelrahim, 2012;Malone et al, 2018). The observed increase of droplet size in the experiments was the coalescence on the top of glass lens due to the resurfacing of droplets by Figure 2.…”
Section: Effect Of Pressure On Oil Droplet Sizes Under Various Dor Ansupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The insignificant effect implied that CDO droplets, once fully dispersed, may not have a remarkable variation in size. The result was an agreement with the negligible effect of the pressure on droplet size distribution of crude oil in Deepwater as well as the assumptions (Abdelrahim, 2012;Malone et al, 2018). The observed increase of droplet size in the experiments was the coalescence on the top of glass lens due to the resurfacing of droplets by Figure 2.…”
Section: Effect Of Pressure On Oil Droplet Sizes Under Various Dor Ansupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In DHW spill site, the oil density at seafloor obtained based on empirical calculation was 4.5 % higher than the sea surface oil density by acoustic measurement (Camilli et al, 2011;Socolofsky et al, 2011). With the presence of dispersant, approximately 31% of interfacial tension between oil and water was enhanced because of increasing pressure, implying a less effective dispersion in deep-water conditions (Abdelrahim, 2012). The change of interfacial tension reflected the alternation of the destabilization of surfactants and the possible change of droplet size controlled by high pressure (Johansen et al, 2013;Khelifa and So, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…They used the reported daily dispersant injection amount to estimate an average dispersant‐to‐oil ratio by assuming uniform mixing at the source and a constant injection rate. The interfacial tension of the oil and gas in water was reduced by a factor of 5.4, based on the estimated DOR and experimental results in Abdelrahim and Rao (2014). This flow rate and the oil properties predicted by TAMOC were provided to VDROP‐J to estimate the initial gas bubble and oil droplet size distribution.…”
Section: Empirical and Integral Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] The experiment was conducted in an ambient cell containing continuous phase (with surfactant concentrations between 0 to 750 ppm) into which a pendant droplet was introduced. More details regarding experimental setup and procedure can be found in Abdelrahim et al [14] The interfacial tension is computed by fitting a curve respecting Laplace equation of capillarity, to the shape and profile of the pendant drop obtained from the experiment. The curve fitting exercise was done by the image analysis software.…”
Section: Dimensionless Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%