1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf03004856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of intratracheal oxygen concentrations during face mask administration of oxygen: A modification for improved control

Abstract: Direct measurement of the inspired tracheal oxygen concentration was made in patients breathing through standard aerosol face masks. Factors affecting the tracheal FIO2 were analyzed using both mechanical and mathematical models. When oxygen is delivered to the face mask at low flow rates, there is considerable patient variation in the measured tracheal FIO2. Delivery of oxygen at higher flow rates (15 litres per minute or greater), reduces such variation. Furthermore, turbulent air currents within and around … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 100% O 2 delivered at 15 L/min through a standard hospital face mask results in a true F I O 2 of 0.70 AE 0.10. Even at 30 L/min, F I O 2 is 0.85 AE 0.05 (Wexler et al 1975). None of these confounding variables was standardized or reported in either study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, 100% O 2 delivered at 15 L/min through a standard hospital face mask results in a true F I O 2 of 0.70 AE 0.10. Even at 30 L/min, F I O 2 is 0.85 AE 0.05 (Wexler et al 1975). None of these confounding variables was standardized or reported in either study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even at 30 L/min, F I O 2 is 0.85 ± 0.05 (Wexler et al. ). None of these confounding variables was standardized or reported in either study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Die mög-liche F I O 2 liegt etwa bei 0,6. Eine genaue Angabe der tatsächlich erreichten F I O 2 ist bei der Verwendung dieser Systeme kaum möglich, da neben den individuellen Parametern auch die situative Flussdynamik berücksichtigt werden muss [27].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified