2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5065509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of localized plasma perturbation with hairpin resonator probes

Abstract: In situ plasma diagnostics present the classical problem of the scientific measurement: how does one accurately measure a system without also perturbing it? The uncertainty in the degree of perturbation then reflects an inherent uncertainty in the diagnostic results. Microwave probes are no exception. This work discusses an experimental methodology for quantifying the local perturbation in hairpin resonator probe measurements. By pulsing the delivered power to a plasma, an electron density hairpin spike (HS) i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At power-off, n e exhibits a slow decay (relative to T e ) with τ n = 150-250 μs, as one would expect from literature [11,12,[31][32][33][34]. A spike in n e occurs within 5 μs of power off, previously explained as probe sheath collapse manifesting as an observed increase in n e [35]. A dip in n e corresponding to sheath expansion can also be observed immediately after power on.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At power-off, n e exhibits a slow decay (relative to T e ) with τ n = 150-250 μs, as one would expect from literature [11,12,[31][32][33][34]. A spike in n e occurs within 5 μs of power off, previously explained as probe sheath collapse manifesting as an observed increase in n e [35]. A dip in n e corresponding to sheath expansion can also be observed immediately after power on.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The sensitivity to the assumption in k has been noted previously, motivating additional investigation [7]. Sheath collapse at the beginning of the power-off cycle permits the estimation of k by matching steady state n e to the peak value after sheath collapse [35]. Using this approach, k = 1.3 can be estimated for steady state for a 2 μs linear decrease to k = 1 after power-off.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…An electron temperature T e = 2 eV is assumed for the sheath corrections, which is a source of uncertainty. One Debye length is chosen based on previous work in which floating probe sheath thickness is estimated [28]. Hairpin probes exhibit Lorentzian resonance profiles because the resonance is resistive-inductive-capacitive (RLC) in nature [25,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various microwave diagnostics have been developed such as the plasma absorption probe [13,14], the multipole resonance probe [15,16], the hairpin probe [8,17,18], and the cutoff probe (CP) [10][11][12]. Related principles and recent progress are well explained elsewhere [10,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%