Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors
DOI: 10.4324/9780203451656_chapter_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of party positions on the basis of party programmes, media coverage and voter perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional computer-coded content analysis, however, is simply a direct attempt to reproduce the hand-coding of texts, using computer algorithms to match texts to coding dictionaries. With proper dictionaries linking specific words or phrases to predetermined policy positions, traditional techniques for the computer-coding of texts can produce estimates of policy positions that have a high cross-validity when measured against hand-coded content analyses of the same texts, as well as against completely independent data sources (Bara 2001;de Vries, Giannetti, and Mansergh 2001;Kleinnijenhuis and Pennings 2001;Laver and Garry 2000). Paradoxically, however, this approach does not dispense with the need for heavy human input, given the extensive effort needed to develop and test coding dictionaries that are sensitive to the strategic contextboth substantive and temporal-of the texts analyzed.…”
Section: W E Present a New Way Of Extracting Policy Positions From Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional computer-coded content analysis, however, is simply a direct attempt to reproduce the hand-coding of texts, using computer algorithms to match texts to coding dictionaries. With proper dictionaries linking specific words or phrases to predetermined policy positions, traditional techniques for the computer-coding of texts can produce estimates of policy positions that have a high cross-validity when measured against hand-coded content analyses of the same texts, as well as against completely independent data sources (Bara 2001;de Vries, Giannetti, and Mansergh 2001;Kleinnijenhuis and Pennings 2001;Laver and Garry 2000). Paradoxically, however, this approach does not dispense with the need for heavy human input, given the extensive effort needed to develop and test coding dictionaries that are sensitive to the strategic contextboth substantive and temporal-of the texts analyzed.…”
Section: W E Present a New Way Of Extracting Policy Positions From Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each country, all articles related to the electoral contest or politics in general were selected from a quality newspaper and a tabloid, covering the last 2 months before the election. 3 The articles were coded sentence-by-sentence using a method developed by Kleinnijenhuis and Pennings (2001). The data predominantly captures statements that party exponents make at press conferences and on other occasions, and the campaign data therefore closely reflects what voters actually know of the parties' positions.…”
Section: The Extreme Populist Right In France and Germany: Research Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content analysis leads to a frequency distribution that reveals the relative weight of all policy areas. Earlier content analysis on the basis of this technique has shown that it is possible to code manifestos with word lists and to arrive at reliable results that are comparable to or even better than the coding done by humans (Kleinnijenhuis and Pennings, 2001;Laver and Garry, 2000;Laver et al, 2003). The dictionary is validated by means of the Keyword-In-Context technique, which allows one to examine the occurrences of key words in their textual environment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%