2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/270651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Redox Potential in Nanoecotoxicological Investigations

Abstract: Redox potential has been identified by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as one of the parameters that should be investigated for the testing of manufactured nanomaterials. There is still some ambiguity concerning this parameter, i.e., as to what and how to measure, particularly when in a nanoecotoxicological context. In this study the redox potentials of six nanomaterials (either zinc oxide (ZnO) or cerium oxide (CeO2)) dispersions were measured using an oxidation-reduction pot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equations [9] and [10] account for their remarkable SOD-like activity, which is somewhat higher than for SOD enzyme (138), log k cat = 9.55. The E 1/2 for Ce IV /Ce III redox couple varies with medium, and in deionized water, it is * + 400 mV versus NHE (261). Neither charge nor reduction potential easily justifies…”
Section: Fe(iii) Porphyrinsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The equations [9] and [10] account for their remarkable SOD-like activity, which is somewhat higher than for SOD enzyme (138), log k cat = 9.55. The E 1/2 for Ce IV /Ce III redox couple varies with medium, and in deionized water, it is * + 400 mV versus NHE (261). Neither charge nor reduction potential easily justifies…”
Section: Fe(iii) Porphyrinsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…ORP values may also serve as a simple, rapid and real‐time proxy indicator for ozone concentration in water (Seki et al, 2017; Suslow, 2004) and is commonly used by aquaculture operators instead of ozone measurements through titration due to the complexity, cost and time required to process samples. Since contaminants in water (from salt, bacterial or Nutrient Broth media used in experiments) interfere with ORP readings, we conducted OPR reading on the NB generator in freshwater to eliminate biased ORP readings caused by ‘dirty’ water (Tantra et al, 2012). The pre‐trials were set up with the three NB gases (air, oxygen, ozone), replicated three times and ran for 15 minutes each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further electrical conductivity was measured by conductivity meter 304 (Systronics). The turbidity could be determined by the clarity of the solution after mixing 0.5 g each of the control and test samples in 20 mL of deionized water (Snowden et al 2012).…”
Section: Porosity (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%