1950
DOI: 10.2307/2405599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Sexual Isolation and Selective Mating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They then calculated a ''joint isolation index'' for both sexes and both species (Merrell, 1950) to measure sexual isolation:…”
Section: Reanalysis Of Anderson and Kim (2005) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They then calculated a ''joint isolation index'' for both sexes and both species (Merrell, 1950) to measure sexual isolation:…”
Section: Reanalysis Of Anderson and Kim (2005) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major criticism of the joint isolation index (I) is its poor statistical estimation properties due to uncorrected marginal effects (Merrell 1950;Gilbert and Starmer 1985;Rolán-Alvarez and Caballero 2000). Rolán-Alvarez and Caballero (2000) defined a new index, I PSI , using a pair sexual isolation (PSI) statistic which estimates mate choice coefficients for each type of mating pair.…”
Section: Statistical Analyzes Of Mating Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first tested for random mating between the strains using a 2 9 2 contingency Chi-square test. We calculated two kinds of isolation index: I, the joint isolation index (Merrell 1950;Malogolowkin-Cohen et al 1965) and I PSI , the isolation index utilizing the PSI coefficients of Rolán-Alvarez and Caballero (2000). We have indicated values of the isolation indices that differ significantly from zero using the standard error derived by Malogolowkin-Cohen et al (1965), and values of I PSI that differ significantly from zero using the JMATING software of Carvajal-Rodriguez and Rolán-Alvarez (2006).…”
Section: Sexual Isolation Between Geographic Strains Of D Pseudoobscuramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analogy with the 'isolation estimate', 'female mating ratio', and 'male mating ratio' of Merrell (1950), we have compared the following regression lines: (1) homogamic and heterogamic matings (in this special case, N is always 30, for all the assayed relative frequencies), (2) matings of females of both types in competition, (3) matings of males of both types. Tables 1 to 8 give also, in C, the K coefficients for males and for females, with their standard errors (SEM), calculated according to Petit and Ehrman (1968).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%