2019
DOI: 10.1149/1.1837392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Silicon Particles by Laser Surface Scanning and Angle‐Resolved Light Scattering

Abstract: Distinguishing false counts caused by surface microroughness and haze when measuring particles below 0.1 1im has become a significant concern for ultralarge scale integrated (ULSI) product yield. Initial results are presented from an industry-wide, cross-functional, SEMATECH task force exploring this issue by investigating both measurement capability and alternative detector strategies for laser surface scanners. Polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres and real-world particles deposited under controlled conditions on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a usual phenomenon occured in particle counter with light scattering principle when inspecting the particle other than PSL, calibration particle of the counter due to the different refractive index value. This phenomenon is reported in other studies [3,4,5]. And there are some contaminants in the result.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It is a usual phenomenon occured in particle counter with light scattering principle when inspecting the particle other than PSL, calibration particle of the counter due to the different refractive index value. This phenomenon is reported in other studies [3,4,5]. And there are some contaminants in the result.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our experiment shows that 50 nm is often confused with 40 nm. The reason is that there is a small difference between the scattering cross sections generated by these two particle sizes (the scattering varies by the sixth power of the diameter [32]). It is clearly visible that most misclassification involves the background class.…”
Section: A Closed Set Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilize calibrated samples of polystyrene latex (PSL) nanospheres, spin-coated on the silicon wafer, with diameters ranging from 40 to 80 nm to collect the training data. Polystyrene particles are standard for the calibration of surface inspection tools because they have wellcharacterized optical properties (low index of refraction, thus most challenging to detect) and a very tight monodisperse size distribution [32]. Furthermore, for the classification, we study the areas of the wafer where the nanoparticle is absent, contributing to the "background" class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Although CFS was primarily used to measure and reconstruct periodic structures, 8,9 this approach possesses a high potential for the detection of single particles. 10,11 A particle in the focal point of a lens disturbs an incoming wave, even if the particle is of a size below the diffraction-limited resolution. Such a disruption of the wavefront by nanoparticles can be evaluated in the exit pupil plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%