2016
DOI: 10.7896/j.1624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of sustainability in agriculture: a review of indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
148
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(191 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
148
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most acknowledged is the reduction of 9 expenditure on chemical inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) through the use of substitutes, which can be considered at the farm level and reveal farmers' practices in favour of the environment (van der Werf and Petit, 2002;Braband et al, 2003;Bockstaller et al, 2011;Majewski, 2013;Sabiha et al, 2016). Soil management reduces the impact of human activities on biodiversity (Alkan Olsson et al, 2009;Lebacq et al, 2013;Latruffe et al, 2016). Other indicators are considered, because of their direct impact in favour of the environment: careful management of water resources and the level of energy dependence.…”
Section: Environmental Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most acknowledged is the reduction of 9 expenditure on chemical inputs (fertilizers and pesticides) through the use of substitutes, which can be considered at the farm level and reveal farmers' practices in favour of the environment (van der Werf and Petit, 2002;Braband et al, 2003;Bockstaller et al, 2011;Majewski, 2013;Sabiha et al, 2016). Soil management reduces the impact of human activities on biodiversity (Alkan Olsson et al, 2009;Lebacq et al, 2013;Latruffe et al, 2016). Other indicators are considered, because of their direct impact in favour of the environment: careful management of water resources and the level of energy dependence.…”
Section: Environmental Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies considered this dimension through the well-being of the farmer and his family. In such cases, the level of education, the working time or the total workforce are the main factors used to evaluate social sustainability (Lebacq et al, 2013;Terrier et al, 2013;Latruffe et al, 2016). However, these criteria suffer from a certain degree of subjectivity while the economic and environmental dimensions are based on objective factors (Latruffe et al, 2016).…”
Section: Social Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was analyzed in a study by Madau et al [28] that was aimed at highlighting the possible relationships between the challenges that the CAP faces if it is to guarantee sustainability in the sector and evaluating how promoting these policy priorities can affect sustainability. Also, according to Latruffe et al [29], in recent decades, the concept of sustainability has become increasingly prominent in agricultural policy debates. This has led more stakeholders to pay attention to the questions of monitoring and evaluating agricultural practices, and raised the question of what are the appropriate indicators to assess sustainability aspects of given practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 (2019), 211-223 214 cators, concluded that all indicators are perceived as useful and considered feasible to measure at the farm level. As underlined by Latruffe et al (2016), developments of the farms economics may lead the factors such as output and input prices, yields, output sales, support and regulation, social-related employment and quality of rural areas. And focus on environmental protection, promoting more efficient use of natural resources and resilience of farmers.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%